2018
DOI: 10.1515/erj-2017-0140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Do Accelerators Fit in the Venture Creation Pipeline? Different Values Brought by Different Types of Accelerators

Abstract: Despite the emergence of startup accelerators as venture development organizations (VDOs) to high-growth firms, research has yet to identify where these accelerators fit into the venture development ecosystem. By clarifying and reviewing three different subsystems in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, our paper proposes that as an extension of the current incubation mechanism, accelerators contribute to the entrepreneurial ecosystem by transforming entrepreneurs and their ventures at early stages. Drawing upon the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the relative novelty of accelerators, there is also little systematic research on their impact on participating companies and the start-up community. This is largely related to the various business model logics of corporate accelerators (Pauwels et al 2016;Pilewicz and Maria 2017;Yang et al 2018). The categorization of business models of cooperation between corporations and start-ups offers initial guidelines but lacks further conceptualization of the specific motives and challenges associated with it.…”
Section: Corporate Accelerators As a Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relative novelty of accelerators, there is also little systematic research on their impact on participating companies and the start-up community. This is largely related to the various business model logics of corporate accelerators (Pauwels et al 2016;Pilewicz and Maria 2017;Yang et al 2018). The categorization of business models of cooperation between corporations and start-ups offers initial guidelines but lacks further conceptualization of the specific motives and challenges associated with it.…”
Section: Corporate Accelerators As a Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument agrees with Hackett and Dilts (2004), who view dynamic capabilities framework an appropriate approach to "facilitate inquiries into the way in which business incubators builds new venture development resources and capabilities and allocates these resources to the transformation of startups into value-producers" (Hackett & Dilts, 2004, p. 46). Both business incubators and accelerators have been acknowledged by policymakers, private investors, corporations and academics, as effective ways to support the creation of new firms and deal with their needs in their early stages (Pauwels et al, 2016;Yang, Kher, & Lyons, 2018) so we believe that the dynamic capabilities view is also an appropriate lens to analyze the processes embedded in business accelerator programs and explore their outcomes.…”
Section: Dynamic Capabilities and Business Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent added value provided as part of the network capabilities are seed funding, mentorship, and access to a large investor network (Hochberg, 2016). Since accelerators make the first round of investment in these new ventures, they are driven to increase the value of their investment or obtain an exit for investment with superior returns in the near future (Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Resource Based View Theory and Its Application To Accelementioning
confidence: 99%
“…funding, survivability, acquisition, and growth. Since deal-flow accelerators receive funding from private investors like business angels or venture capital funds (VC), their core objective is to identify and fund investable ventures (Yang et al, 2018), so we introduced four variables to focus on the ventures' funding performance. These approaches overcome the abovementioned three limitations, viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%