2014
DOI: 10.3402/meo.v19.24441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where do we go from here? Moving from systems-based practice process measures to true competency via developmental milestones

Abstract: For many educators it has been challenging to meet the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's requirements for teaching systems-based practice (SBP). An additional layer of complexity for educators is evaluating competency in SBP, despite milestones and entrustable professional activities (EPAs). In order to address this challenge, the authors present the results of a literature review for how SBP is currently being taught and a series of recommendations on how to achieve competency in SBP for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the changing landscapes of healthservices delivery models and an increasingly diverse patient population, medical education is moving from systems-based practice to competency-based education. 24,25 Although GCs have been progressive in adapting competency-based training, the current education model also involves intense clinical and research training that requires a tremendous hands-on effort from faculty and has many limitations that prevent a significant increase in class size. Accreditation requirements, especially regarding clinical training, may not always reflect available resources locally or be encouraging to expansion efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the changing landscapes of healthservices delivery models and an increasingly diverse patient population, medical education is moving from systems-based practice to competency-based education. 24,25 Although GCs have been progressive in adapting competency-based training, the current education model also involves intense clinical and research training that requires a tremendous hands-on effort from faculty and has many limitations that prevent a significant increase in class size. Accreditation requirements, especially regarding clinical training, may not always reflect available resources locally or be encouraging to expansion efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The definition, performance, training, and evaluation of SBP is considered by many to be the most challenging among the 6 competencies. [3][4][5] Despite the ACGME's introduction of SBP as a core competency more than 20 years ago, with the requirement for SBP teaching and assessment, the published literature suggests that program directors continue to struggle with implementing curricula and assessing residents' competency in this domain. 4 Teaching of the various subcompetencies of SBP is inconsistent and variable across training programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Despite the ACGME's introduction of SBP as a core competency more than 20 years ago, with the requirement for SBP teaching and assessment, the published literature suggests that program directors continue to struggle with implementing curricula and assessing residents' competency in this domain. 4 Teaching of the various subcompetencies of SBP is inconsistent and variable across training programs. [6][7][8] Many programs rely on passive learning approaches and indirect observation without objective criteria for demonstration of residents' knowledge and skill.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underestimating the adequate number of 'units of practice could result in poor performance during assessments. Too many units of practice would not be efficient for both the supervisor and the trainee (Martinez, Phillips and Harris, 2014). Further research needs to be conducted using both qualitative and quantitative data to arrive at the optimal number of units of practice required for each EPA category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%