2013
DOI: 10.1080/0020739x.2013.780215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where does the calculus go? An investigation of how calculus ideas are used in later coursework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The research findings are supported by many studies who tried to compare the procedural skills of students in experimental groups, taught by using ICT with those from control groups taught traditionally (Code, Piccolo, Kohler & MacLean, 2014;Arslan, 2010;Czocher, Tague & Baker, 2013). Result of these studies found that there is no significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Test Of Significant Difference In the Pretest And Posttest Psupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The research findings are supported by many studies who tried to compare the procedural skills of students in experimental groups, taught by using ICT with those from control groups taught traditionally (Code, Piccolo, Kohler & MacLean, 2014;Arslan, 2010;Czocher, Tague & Baker, 2013). Result of these studies found that there is no significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Test Of Significant Difference In the Pretest And Posttest Psupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In Study C, I present a curricular matchup analysis of two engineering courses, Circuits and Statics, and compare the content of each against the calculus course which they list as a prerequisite. The full corpus of homework problems for one semester in each of these courses is taken as the sample, and analyzed with the mathematics-in-use technique [1]. Overall, very few of the assigned problems use any calculus at all, just 8% in statics and 20% in circuits.…”
Section: Study Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…То значи да је у развојном смислу оправдано да ученик упражњава различите мисаоне операције у математици, које представљају начине функционисања непотпуно развијених когнитивних микроструктура (способности, вештине, знање и искуства). Таква улога припада задацима који захтевају виши ниво математичког мишљења (Ärlebäck et al, 2013;Czocher, Tague, & Baker, 2013). То произилази из логике унутрашњих особина процеса когнитивног развоја и подразумева прихватање става да се на развој когнитивног капацитета код ученика може систематски утицати организованом наставом и учењем (Swanson & Williams, 2014), што је становиште које се исходишно јавља у оквиру теорије интелектуалног развоја Л. С. Виготског.…”
Section: прилагођавање тежине задатка и когнитивни изазовunclassified