2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00676.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Have All The Workers Gone? Exploring Public Sector Workforce Planning

Abstract: Governments undertake extensive planning of many services and functions, but tend to neglect planning of public service workforces. Disruptions to public service delivery, such as shortages of nurses and doctors, have rejuvenated interest in workforce planning, but many organisations struggle to do it effectively. This historical study examines the capacity of central personnel agencies to predict workforce risks and support workforce planning, using a study of the Queensland public service. It identifies lack… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Australia, for example, institutional capacity was reduced as strong central personnel agencies were abolished, and their functions were distributed horizontally to other central agencies and vertically to line ministries and agencies (Alford, 1993). While there have been some benefits from the devolution of human resource management (Teo & Rodwell, 2007), there has also been a loss of coordination, with overall responsibility for the monitoring of service-wide trends and the quality, cost and productivity of labour falling between the many stools (Colley & Price, 2010;Nethercote, 1989Nethercote, , 1996. It was this package of reforms that came to be identified as the New Public Management (NPM).…”
Section: The Hr Implications Of Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, for example, institutional capacity was reduced as strong central personnel agencies were abolished, and their functions were distributed horizontally to other central agencies and vertically to line ministries and agencies (Alford, 1993). While there have been some benefits from the devolution of human resource management (Teo & Rodwell, 2007), there has also been a loss of coordination, with overall responsibility for the monitoring of service-wide trends and the quality, cost and productivity of labour falling between the many stools (Colley & Price, 2010;Nethercote, 1989Nethercote, , 1996. It was this package of reforms that came to be identified as the New Public Management (NPM).…”
Section: The Hr Implications Of Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if on one hand the surplus of resources can be considered wasteful, the lack of it can compromise the provision of services and generate significant damage to society (Colley & Price, 2010). For this reason, the Government seeks to improve its Labor Force Planning models in order to reallocate the workforce according to the real needs of the organization (Anderson, 2004;Colley & Price, 2010). Therefore, the main advance of administrative reforms is the search for actions based on the application of the principles of strategic planning in public management by results (Corrêa, 2007).…”
Section: Absenteeism In Public Organization and Workforce Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Colley and Price (2010), HRP process has been applied by very few public sector organizations in many countries, including Australia. Government experience a huge challenge of retaining and attracting skilled employees.…”
Section: Factors Of Hrpmentioning
confidence: 99%