2019
DOI: 10.1080/23322373.2019.1648999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where have foreign banks in Nigeria gone? Market structure, competitive intensity and the capabilities of Nigeria banks

Abstract: Privately-owned Nigerian banks hold 94% of Nigeria banking assets, the world's second largest share of local ownership. Theoretical explanations for the dominance of local firms related to liabilities of foreignness do not explain this phenomenon, as foreign banks do not experience additional costs compared to local Nigerian banks. In search for explanation, we focus on market structure, competitive intensity and their impact on capability development. In-depth exploratory study of Nigeria banking industry, ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, this was hampered by regulatory restrictions, particularly in developing countries. The local banks’ acquisition through privatization policies and the creation of subsidiaries is the main catalysts for foreign investors (Nachum & Ogbechie, 2019). Similarly, foreign ownership can allow the transfer of new management methods and knowledge to local banks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, this was hampered by regulatory restrictions, particularly in developing countries. The local banks’ acquisition through privatization policies and the creation of subsidiaries is the main catalysts for foreign investors (Nachum & Ogbechie, 2019). Similarly, foreign ownership can allow the transfer of new management methods and knowledge to local banks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar inconsistencies are found with respect to the institutional determinants of foreign venture capital (Hearn, Oxelheim, & Randøy, 2018 ). Nachum and Ogbechie ( 2019 , 2023 ) demonstrate competitive dynamics between foreign and local banks in Nigeria that are inconsistent with the notion of the liability of foreignness. Researchers have identified puzzling theoretical inconsistencies in MNEs’ non-market strategies for dealing with corruption, political risk, CSR, and crony capitalism in Africa (e.g., Darendeli & Hill, 2016 ; Parente, Rong, Geleilate, & Misati, 2019 Stevens & Newenham-Kahindi, 2017 , 2021 ).…”
Section: Africa As a Source Of Theoretical Puzzles For Ibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onura (2019) gave comprehensive reasons on low derivatives market activities in west Africa. The study on effect of capital market on economic growth and development of Nigeria (2000Nigeria ( -2017, brought into focus that among other reasons why capital market in Nigeria had not developed was because of unavailability of internet services, poor capital market security and unfavorable governmental policies with political selfish interests.The presence of low concentration of foreign owned banks in Nigeria which was 6% according to Nachum and Ogbechie (2019), had greatly affected the derivatives market. The study which concentrated on understanding the negative aspects of having 94% locally owned banks in Nigeria, shed light that the country had greatly lost in terms of foreign direct investments making it lag behind especially in application of derivatives market in its stock exchange.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%