Where I was and how I will prove it

Nieuwkamp, Hendrikus Johannes Christoffel

doi:10.26481/dis.20180307rn

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Les résultats partiels obtenus successivement ont été publiés dans une série de mémoires dont on trouvera ci-dessous la liste (6). Des exposés d'ensemble de question ont paru à plusieurs reprises en hollandais (7) et en allemand (9) au des dernières années; mais comme il n'en existe aucun en langue française, je pas cru superflu de présenter aux lecteurs de ce Journal une revue critique du sujet, en renvoyant pour les détails de technique expérimentale aux travaux cités plus haut.…”

Section: Jean Timmermansunclassified

La solubilité mutuelle des liquides sous pression variable

Timmermans¹

1922

J. Chim. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

LiBHAiRiR GAUTHIER-V 1LLA.RS ET G'* 55, Q uai des Granda-AuguStins Totis droits réservés Avec une T. C. S. supérieure : {retrait ou scission simples) Nitrobenzène et ses homologues-f-les paraffines. Aniline et ses homologues-t-les paraffines, les polyméthjlènes, l'amylène. lodure de méthylène, SO^-H les paraffines, et les polyméthylènes. GO^-h CBr'H. Avec une T. C. S. inférieure {retrait critique). GO' + nitrobenzène et beaucoup de ses dérivés de substitution halogénés. Ether-+-chrysène.

show abstract

Section: Jean Timmermansunclassified

La solubilité mutuelle des liquides sous pression variable

Timmermans¹

1922

J. Chim. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Whereas such an alibi would remain unsupported before these technological advancements, nowadays these data can serve as supportive alibi evidence. Police detectives more often report these new types of physical evidence to support their alibis than do laypeople (Nieuwkamp, 2018). Therefore, it can be argued that police detectives are more aware of the presence of such physical evidence when they are asked for their whereabouts than are laypeople.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it can be argued that police detectives are more aware of the presence of such physical evidence when they are asked for their whereabouts than are laypeople. This might explain why detectives put such high demands on a suspect's alibi (Dysart & Strange, 2012) before they find it believable (Nieuwkamp, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results of the present experiments add to those recent findings. We therefore call for more alibi research involving police detectives as participants in order to better understand how they evaluate alibis in practice, especially since they are the first to encounter and evaluate the alibis in practice (Culhane & Hosch, 2012;Nieuwkamp, 2018). Taking these reflections into account, further research should focus on adapting the criteria for determining the strength of physical evidence to correspond to the way in which alibis are evaluated in practice in combination with newer evidence from cell phones.…”

Section: Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, in future research these technological advancements should be taken into account determining whether the current criteria for establishing the strength of supportive evidence (Olson & Charman, 2012) still apply. One could argue that laypeople are more aware of the presence of technological evidence to support their alibis as that technology is more visible in our daily lives or at least police detectives are aware of the presence of such evidence (Nieuwkamp, 2018) and it is therefore of interest to study in more detail.…”

Section: Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

You don’t know: knowledge as supportive alibi evidence

Nieuwkamp¹,

Horselenberg

Koppen

2022

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

show abstract

When the Evidence Is Incorrect: an Exploration of What Happens When Interviewers Unwittingly Present Inaccurate Information in Interviews with Suspects

Beek

Bull

Chen³

2021

J Police Crim Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Skillfully presenting evidence/information to suspects is one of the few interviewing techniques that increases the likelihood of guilty suspects providing information or making a confession, without making innocent ones do so as well. It is important that this evidence/information is correct, since deliberately disclosing incorrect evidence poses some risks. Also, in real-life interviews, police interviewers may unwittingly disclose incorrect evidence, for example when a witness was mistaken and provided the police with incorrect information. The present study examined the behavior of fifty police interviewers in interviews with “suspects” of a scripted crime: what is their response when the interviewees try to explain to them that some of the evidence/information just disclosed by them is incorrect? Eleven interviewers responded adaptively (by actively picking up on this new information), 35 responded in a neutral way and four responded maladaptively (by discrediting the interviewee’s claim). Experience and a full interview training had a significant negative relationship with adaptiveness. These results indicate that, when preparing and conducting interviews with suspects, greater awareness is needed of the possibility that some of the evidence/information that is to be disclosed could be incorrect, and therefore it is crucial that suspects’ responses which suggest such may be the case are taken into account.

show abstract

Where I was and how I will prove it

Cited by 4 publications

References 50 publications

La solubilité mutuelle des liquides sous pression variable

La solubilité mutuelle des liquides sous pression variable

You don’t know: knowledge as supportive alibi evidence

When the Evidence Is Incorrect: an Exploration of What Happens When Interviewers Unwittingly Present Inaccurate Information in Interviews with Suspects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About