2000
DOI: 10.52086/001c.35895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where is Writing Now?: Australian University Creative Writing Programs at the End of the Millennium

Abstract: In the early 1990s, creative writing programs in Australia were ‘thrust’ into the university domain by the Dawkins amalgamations. Prior to that, there was no established national focus: no national peak body, no discipline-based research agenda, no political or academic networking, and no statistical analysis to portray the nature of the activity advancing apace on isolated campuses. Compared with the visual and performing arts disciplines, creative writing programs were unorganised and separatist, but they we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Whether these segregations have been broken down by the expansion of creative writing within higher education is a matter of ongoing debate.) According to Paul Dawson (2001), splits between the two fields can be traced to traditions within a British literary education, with which Australian English departments were strongly aligned, whereby the "production within the academy [that is, the university] of writing which purported to be literature was looked down upon as improper and presumptuous" (p. 2) (see also Krauth, 2000).…”
Section: S -The Mistake Of Limiting Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(Whether these segregations have been broken down by the expansion of creative writing within higher education is a matter of ongoing debate.) According to Paul Dawson (2001), splits between the two fields can be traced to traditions within a British literary education, with which Australian English departments were strongly aligned, whereby the "production within the academy [that is, the university] of writing which purported to be literature was looked down upon as improper and presumptuous" (p. 2) (see also Krauth, 2000).…”
Section: S -The Mistake Of Limiting Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1960s and 1970s the Academy had no widely agreed upon intention to bridge such long-standing divisions between the production of "crafted artefacts" and their analysis and criticism (White, 1998, p. 103) or, as Nigel Krauth (2000) puts it, between "reading and criticising texts, as opposed to producing them" (p. 4) -in other words, between the "living humanities" and the academic humanities. This applied not only to local literature but to other creative fields.…”
Section: S -The Mistake Of Limiting Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations