Where Lies the Risk? An Ecological Approach to Understanding Child Mental Health Risk and Vulnerabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Efforts at improving child-health and development initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa had focused on the physical health of children due to the neglect of child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) policy initiatives. A thorough and broad-based understanding of the prevalent child mental-health risk and vulnerability factors is needed to successfully articulate CAMH policies. In this discourse, we present a narrative on the child mental-health risk and vulnerability factors in sub-Saharan Africa. Through an ecological point of view, we identified widespread family poverty, poor availability and uptake of childcare resources, inadequate community and institutional childcare systems, and inadequate framework for social protection for vulnerable children as among the risk and vulnerability factors for CAMH in the region. Others are poor workplace policy/practice that does not support work-family life balance, poor legislative framework for child protection, and some harmful traditional practices. We conclude that an ecological approach shows that child mental-health risks are diverse and cut across different layers of the care environment. The approach also provides a broad and holistic template from which appropriate CAMH policy direction in sub-Saharan Africa can be understood.

In Their Own Words: Using Open-Ended Assessment to Identify Culturally Relevant Concerns among Kenyan Adolescents

“…Previous research has identified a robust association between poverty and mental health problems (Lund et al, 2010), potentially because poverty and mental health problems compound one another through a vicious cycle (Lund et al, 2011). It may be especially important for intervention scientists working in low-resource settings to be aware of the economic and educational obstacles facing young people (Atilola, 2014), potentially incorporating lessons to help youths manage these challenges (Ismayilova et al, 2018).…”

The concept of a child within sub‐Saharan African migrant homes: Reconciling culture and child rights

“…In past years, sub-Saharan African childrearing customs have always been distinct, operating within their own rules, values, and practices (Boakye-Boaten, 2010; Salami et al, 2017). These customs, which define a child and determine childhood, are founded on the core values of Ubuntu (Atilola, 2014;Rankin, 2000). They separate sub-Saharan African definitions and conceptualization of a child from Western perspectives, particularly within the Australian context.…”