2021
DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2021.1982119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where ordinary laws fall short: ‘riverine rights’ and constitutionalism

Abstract: Laws that recognise rivers and their ecosystems as legal persons or subjects with their own rights, duties and obligations have been associated with theories of environmental constitutionalism. However, the extent to, and manner in which, constitutional law (with its elevated status) has been instrumental in the conferral of these 'riverine rights' is still not well-understood. In this article, we consider the constitutional relevance of the recognition of rivers as legal persons or subjects in Aotearoa New Ze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fundamental feature of environmental governance and management in Aotearoa NZ, including the coastal marine environment, is the role of Māori as Te Tiriti o Waitangi/ Treaty of Waitangi partners (Macpherson et al 2021a). The Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840 by the British Crown and a confederation of Māori chiefs; almost immediately upon signing, the Crown breached the terms of the Treaty, which subsequently led to the dispossession of land as well as limited opportunities for Māori to participate formally in environmental decision-making processes and management until the 1990s (Parsons et al 2021a).…”
Section: Marine Governance In Aotearoa Nzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fundamental feature of environmental governance and management in Aotearoa NZ, including the coastal marine environment, is the role of Māori as Te Tiriti o Waitangi/ Treaty of Waitangi partners (Macpherson et al 2021a). The Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840 by the British Crown and a confederation of Māori chiefs; almost immediately upon signing, the Crown breached the terms of the Treaty, which subsequently led to the dispossession of land as well as limited opportunities for Māori to participate formally in environmental decision-making processes and management until the 1990s (Parsons et al 2021a).…”
Section: Marine Governance In Aotearoa Nzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a recent Environment Court decision in Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council (2019: [21]) demonstrates that TMOW is already having a practical impact on water planning in New Zealand, including (in that case) the prioritisation of water's ecological and spiritual health above resource exploitation for primary production. The Court provides an early discussion of the meaning and significance of TMoW, which it describes as an integral part of freshwater management and a fundamental shift in perspective around management of this natural resource (Macpherson et al 2021a;Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council 2019).…”
Section: Prioritising Equity Justice and Social Difference Poumentioning
confidence: 99%