2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where's the value? The worth of public libraries: A systematic review of findings, methods and research gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers readily acknowledge the commonly held view of public libraries as publicly accessible buildings that house collections of print material (e.g., Campbell, 2013, p. 8), where members of the community may develop literacy and learning (e.g., Brophy, 2001, p. 14;Foster and Ford, 2003;Rice, McCreadie and Change, 2001). These researchers have also long argued that public libraries represent so much more than these epistemic functions for which public libraries are traditionally known (e.g., Hoggart, 1957;Norcup, 1997;Williams, 1966), with multifunctional roles that span many different types of community provision over and above information services (e.g., Sørensen, 2021). Some commentators, such as Chowdhury et al (2008, p. 4) have bemoaned the dangers of the traditional picture of public libraries as 'very limited and unhelpful' because it 'omits the various other activities which take place within a library, as well as the roles played by a library in human life and society in general'.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers readily acknowledge the commonly held view of public libraries as publicly accessible buildings that house collections of print material (e.g., Campbell, 2013, p. 8), where members of the community may develop literacy and learning (e.g., Brophy, 2001, p. 14;Foster and Ford, 2003;Rice, McCreadie and Change, 2001). These researchers have also long argued that public libraries represent so much more than these epistemic functions for which public libraries are traditionally known (e.g., Hoggart, 1957;Norcup, 1997;Williams, 1966), with multifunctional roles that span many different types of community provision over and above information services (e.g., Sørensen, 2021). Some commentators, such as Chowdhury et al (2008, p. 4) have bemoaned the dangers of the traditional picture of public libraries as 'very limited and unhelpful' because it 'omits the various other activities which take place within a library, as well as the roles played by a library in human life and society in general'.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and emancipation (e.g., Black, 2000, pp. 3-4;Black and Pepper, 2012, p. 465;Brophy, 2006, p. 3;Sørensen, 2021). The regeneration of communities, for example, is a modern-day function of the public library (Goulding, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Public libraries are cultural institutions that are highly dependent on public funding and thereby they need to be transparent in demonstrating the impact and value they represent in societies, both to strengthen their position and to influence policies and financial decisions (Sørensen, 2020). Recently, these institutions have risen to the challenges born from ongoing social, digital and economic changes and library statistics (EBLIDA, 2013, Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2015 show that the ability of organizations to adapt to these new conditions varies from country to country (European Parliament, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%