Where’s WALY? : A proof of concept study of the ‘wellbeing adjusted life year’ using secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data

Abstract

BackgroundThe Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) is a measure that combines life extension and health improvement in a single score, reflecting preferences around different types of health gain. It can therefore be used to inform decision-making around allocation of health care resources to mutually exclusive options that would produce qualitatively different health benefits. A number of quality-of-life instruments can be used to calculate QALYs. The EQ-5D is one of the most commonly used, and is the preferred option for submissions to NICE (https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/). However, it has limitations that might make it unsuitable for use in areas such as public and mental health where interventions may aim to improve well-being. One alternative to the QALY is a Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year. In this study we explore the need for a Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year measure by examining the extent to which a measure of wellbeing (the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) maps onto the EQ-5D-3L.MethodsSecondary analyses were conducted on data from the Coventry Household Survey in which 7469 participants completed the EQ-5D-3L, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and a measure of self-rated health. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlations, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsApproximately 75 % of participants scored the maximum on the EQ-5D-3L. Those with maximum EQ-5D-3L scores reported a wide range of levels of mental wellbeing. Both the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and the EQ-5D-3L were able to detect differences between those with higher and lower levels of self-reported health. Linear regression indicated that scores on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and the EQ-5D-3L were weakly, positively correlated (with R2 being 0.104 for the index and 0.141 for the visual analogue scale).ConclusionThe Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale maps onto the EQ-5D-3L to only a limited extent. Levels of mental wellbeing varied greatly amongst participants who had the maximum score on the EQ-5D-3L. To evaluate the relative effectiveness of interventions that impact on mental wellbeing, a new measure – a Wellbeing Adjusted Life Year – is needed.

The Psychology of (In)Effective Altruism

“…There is no consensus on how to measure the effectiveness of charities that address other causes, such as the arts, education, or homelessness. Some propose generalizing QALYs by replacing them with well-being-years (WELLBYs) [99,111]. The WELLBY measure aims to incorporate all aspects of well-being, not just health outcomes.…”

Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) for Families of Young Children With Intellectual Disability: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

“…A later definitive trial may extract key resource use items from the Mental Health The feasibility trial identified limitations in expressing the cost-effectiveness of the E-PAtS programme in terms of incremental cost per unit change in the WEMWBS proposed primary outcome measure. The WEMWBS is not currently a preference-based measure that permits the estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) amenable to cost-effectiveness decision-making (42). |The feasibility trial identified a number of attributes from the qualitative research that can potentially be incorporated into a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a preference-based approach for valuing potentially disparate effects of interventions.…”

Mental health support and training to improve secondary school teachers’ well-being: the WISE cluster RCT

“…Aims A mixed-method process evaluation was integrated into the outcome and economic evaluations, 79 following a 'nested' design. 80 The primary aim of the process evaluation was to support the interpretation of the outcome data and further refine the programme theory.…”