2011
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-29-2147-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where to see climate change best in radio occultation variables – study using GCMs and ECMWF reanalyses

Abstract: Abstract. Radio occultation (RO) is a new technique to observe the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), a region that reacts particularly sensitive to climate change. Featuring characteristics such as long-term stability, SI traceability, all-weather capability, global coverage, and high accuracy and vertical resolution, RO data fulfill the requirements for climate monitoring in the UTLS. However, while a range of studies has shown the climate utility of RO it has not yet been explored sytematicall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zonal-mean influence of positive ENSO is warming in the tropical upper troposphere and cooling in the lower stratosphere (Fig. 10b) with maximum zonal-mean response approximately 3 months after ENSO forcing (Randel et al 2009;Lackner et al 2011b;Scherllin-Pirscher et al 2012). The most pronounced zonal-mean tropospheric warming (8-15 km) reaches up to 2 K. Longitudinal UTLS response to ENSO effects occur more rapidly (within 1 month) and feature maximum amplitude in the upper troposphere (near 11 km) and with opposite polarity in a shallow layer near the tropopause (Scherllin- Pirscher et al 2012).…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zonal-mean influence of positive ENSO is warming in the tropical upper troposphere and cooling in the lower stratosphere (Fig. 10b) with maximum zonal-mean response approximately 3 months after ENSO forcing (Randel et al 2009;Lackner et al 2011b;Scherllin-Pirscher et al 2012). The most pronounced zonal-mean tropospheric warming (8-15 km) reaches up to 2 K. Longitudinal UTLS response to ENSO effects occur more rapidly (within 1 month) and feature maximum amplitude in the upper troposphere (near 11 km) and with opposite polarity in a shallow layer near the tropopause (Scherllin- Pirscher et al 2012).…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Vedel and Stendel (2003), Stendel (2006), and Leroy et al (2006a) investigated the value of RO geopotential height and refractivity for climate studies. The complementary sensitivity for monitoring the UTLS was demonstrated with observing system simulation experiments for a medium emission scenario (Steiner et al 2001;Foelsche et al 2008b) and climate change indicators (Lackner et al 2011a).…”
Section: Climate Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high consistency of RO data from different satellites (Hajj et al, 2004;Schreiner et al, 2007;Foelsche et al, 2011) and a comparatively small structural uncertainty (Ho et al, 2012;Steiner et al, 2013), trend studies could already be successfully carried out based on real data (Steiner et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2010;Lackner et al, 2011). In contrast to applications in numerical weather prediction, where parameters close to the observed quantities, such as bending angles, are used in the assimilation, in climate applications all atmospheric parameters need to be considered, since there are regions in the atmosphere, which will, e.g., not show trends in the bending angle, but in temperature (Foelsche et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The climate monitoring capability has first been demonstrated in simulation studies (e.g., Leroy et al, 2006;Ringer and Healy, 2008). Due to the high consistency of RO data from different satellites (Hajj et al, 2004;Schreiner et al, 2007;Foelsche et al, 2011) and a comparatively small structural uncertainty (Ho et al, 2012;Steiner et al, 2013), trend studies could already be successfully carried out based on real data (Steiner et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2010;Lackner et al, 2011). In contrast to applications in numerical weather prediction, where parameters close to the observed quantities, such as bending angles, are used in the assimilation, in climate applications all atmospheric parameters need to be considered, since there are regions in the atmosphere, which will, e.g., not show trends in the bending angle, but in temperature (Foelsche et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%