2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which approach is best for subungual glomus tumors? Transungual with microsurgical dissection of the nail bed or periungual?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean age was found to be 37.4 years (±10.19); similar to studies reported in the literature. We noted that the most frequently involved finger was the third finger, similar to the findings of Madhar et al 17 . Love’s test was positive in all cases; cold hypersensitivity was positive in 70% (19/27) and Hildreth’s test was positive in 67% (18/27) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean age was found to be 37.4 years (±10.19); similar to studies reported in the literature. We noted that the most frequently involved finger was the third finger, similar to the findings of Madhar et al 17 . Love’s test was positive in all cases; cold hypersensitivity was positive in 70% (19/27) and Hildreth’s test was positive in 67% (18/27) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Among these, the nail deformity in one was a minor longitudinal striation (Figure 3). Some studies did not consider minor striations as deformities (Madhar et al., 2015). If minor striations were not considered to be nail deformities, postsurgical nail deformities would have been observed for one patient in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moon et al. (2004) noticed up to 19% of deformities that were actually distal nail splits, whereas longitudinal striations were not considered as nail deformities by others (Madhar et al., 2015). To perform a minimally invasive transungual approach, Ekin et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%