2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which are the best questionnaires to longitudinally evaluate mindfulness skills in personality disorders?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mindfulness has two components, non‐judgmental and accepting; reduce the negative effects of emotions caused by negative automatic thoughts. These two components teach awareness of feelings without automatically reacting, during feeling or idea of hopelessness 16,17 . The studies have revealed that mindfulness is effective on depression and negative automatic thoughts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindfulness has two components, non‐judgmental and accepting; reduce the negative effects of emotions caused by negative automatic thoughts. These two components teach awareness of feelings without automatically reacting, during feeling or idea of hopelessness 16,17 . The studies have revealed that mindfulness is effective on depression and negative automatic thoughts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analysis [ 45 ] has proposed that using a total score without the ‘observing’ subscale is more psychometrically robust so this scoring was used (called FFMQ-15-O to avoid confusion). The FFMQ-15 has been proposed [ 46 ] as the most suitable measure of trait mindfulness in people diagnosed with personality disorders. The reliability of each of the subscales has been reported as good (between 0.75 and 0.91) and the total score is reported as sensitive to change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are certainly well-established measures to assess state mindfulness and trait mindfulness, on a range of different facets and a range of contexts. For example, recent systematic reviews evaluate measures of mindfulness for children and adolescents (Bender et al, 2023) and mindfulness skills in people with personality disorders (Caletti et al, 2020). In their review of measures relevant to the workplace, Qu et al (2015) noted a similar concern to Oman (2023) in that some self-report measures did not demonstrate criterion validity, but were still able to recommend two measures.…”
Section: Self-report Measures Of Mindfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%