Which Bets Paid Off? Early Findings on the Impact of Private Management and K‐8 Conversion Reforms on the Achievement of Philadelphia Students

Abstract

This article reports initial findings from a study of middle grades educational reforms in Philadelphia. We use multilevel change models to analyze the impact on student mathematics achievement of privatization through the use of educational management organizations (EMOs), taking account of the structural reforms (creation of new K-8 schools to replace selected middle schools) occurring simultaneously within the district. Overall, the longitudinal mathematics achievement gains for students in EMO-managed schools were not larger than those for students in schools managed by the district. Non-Edison EMO schools actually performed worse than district-managed schools. With the exception of one older K-8 school in one cohort, Edison schools did not significantly outperform district-managed counterparts. Students in long-established K-8 schools generally outgained students in middle schools, but gains were not as large in newly-established K-8 schools. Across all types of schools, the second cohort of students obtained greater gains than did the first. Copyright 2006 by The Policy Studies Organization.

The Path not Taken: How does School Organization Affect Eighth-Grade Achievement?

“…First, it is not clear that simply shifting all schools to these two models will necessarily produce the effects found here. In particular, conversions of existing schools to these spans may take time to show positive effects (Mac Iver & Mac Iver, 2006).…”

“…For example, Bedard and Do (2005), using national data for 1987 to 1994, concluded that middle schools (Grades 6-8) were associated with lower on-time high school graduation rates. Mac Iver and Mac Iver (2006) and Byrnes and Ruby (2007) found evidence in Philadelphia that students in older K-8 schools, but not in recently converted schools, outperformed those in middle schools, although these older K-8 schools generally served a more advantaged student population.…”

The Effects of School Turnaround in Tennessee’s Achievement School District and Innovation Zones

“…Philadelphia's example could be best characterized as a restart approach focusing on state takeover of schools with governance and management turned over to external operators. Researchers found that these schools did not outperform the gains compared with other schools within Philadelphia (Gill, Zimmer, Christman, & Blanc, 2007;MacIver & MacIver, 2006) despite the additional resources these schools were provided. 1 It is worth noting certain restrictions were placed on schools concerning what reforms they could implement, including a restriction to maintain the schools as neighborhood schools.…”

Understanding site selection of for-profit educational management organization charter schools

“…Government Accountability Office, 2012;Zollers & Ramanathan, 1998). A number of studies indicate that students in profit-oriented EMO charter schools have mixed, or often worse, academic growth (Byrnes, 2009;Educational Policy Institute, 2005;Garcia, Molnar, & Barber, 2009;Gill, Zimmer, Christman, & Blanc, 2007;M. A. Mac Iver & Mac Iver, 2006;Miron, 2008;U.S.…”