2018
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which button will I press? Preference for correctly ordered counting sequences in 18-month-olds.

Abstract: Correct counting respects the stable order principle whereby the count terms are recited in a fixed order every time. The 4 experiments reported here tested whether precounting infants recognize and prefer correct stable-ordered counting. The authors introduced a novel preference paradigm in which infants could freely press two buttons to activate videos of counting events. In the "correct" counting video, number words were always recited in the canonical order ("1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6"). The "incorrect" counting vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Which aspects of the counting routine promote infants’ attention to number? Counting contains a variety of cues that infants might use to identify it as distinct from other verbal acts (Gelman & Gallistel, ; Ip et al ., ; Slaughter et al ., ). Alternatively, simply hearing each objects indicated with a distinct verbal label might have influenced infants’ performance, given that hearing distinctive labels has been found to help infants individuate objects (Xu, Cote, & Baker, ), and chunk objects into groups (Feigenson & Halberda, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Which aspects of the counting routine promote infants’ attention to number? Counting contains a variety of cues that infants might use to identify it as distinct from other verbal acts (Gelman & Gallistel, ; Ip et al ., ; Slaughter et al ., ). Alternatively, simply hearing each objects indicated with a distinct verbal label might have influenced infants’ performance, given that hearing distinctive labels has been found to help infants individuate objects (Xu, Cote, & Baker, ), and chunk objects into groups (Feigenson & Halberda, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which aspects of counting do infants recognize, such that they deploy the ANS? By 18 months, infants detect violations of one‐to‐one correspondence and stable order in counting (Ip et al ., ; Slaughter et al ., )—one or both of these might need to be instantiated in a counting event for infants to activate the ANS. Alternatively, familiarity with actual count words in the sequence might be critical, rather than recognition of abstract counting principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children learn the syntax of number words (Bloom & Wynn, 1997;Ionin & Matushansky, 2019), that they refer to properties of sets, rather than to specific objects (Huang, Spelke, & Snedeker, 2010), and the procedures and principles that govern counting (Fuson, 1988;Wynn, 1990Wynn, , 1992. Children begin this process early in development, with some studies suggesting sensitivity to both the principles (Ip, Imuta, & Slaughter, 2018) and numerical nature of the count list (Wang & Feigenson, 2019) by 18 months. Around 2 years of age, most US children are able to recite some portion of the count list in an unstructured fashion, similar to the ABCs (Fuson, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although infants and toddlers may not fully understand the meaning of number words, recent work suggests they show an early sensitivity to counting. Eighteen-month-old infants showed a preference for correctly ordered counting sequences; that is, although they were unable to recite the count list themselves, they recognized and preferred to listen to the correct order of the number words ( Ip et al, 2018 ). Similarly, 14- to 18-month-old infants appear to be able to use their ability to recognize the count list to help them overcome typical memory limits ( Wang and Feigenson, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%