2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1321-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which factors determine subjective improvement following pelvic organ prolapse 1 year after surgery?

Abstract: The first operation was more often associated with subjective improvement, and both anatomical and functional outcomes were of importance. The mere finding of a statistical significant improvement was no guarantee for subjective improvement after POP surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, two of the three patients with a preoperative PFIQ-7 less than or equal to 20 had no improvement in quality of life after surgery while the remaining 13 patients with a preoperative PFIQ-7 above 20 were improved. Our results are in accordance with those of Lawndy et al [33] showing that even if no difference was observed in anatomical results, some patients reported the absence of symptoms improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, two of the three patients with a preoperative PFIQ-7 less than or equal to 20 had no improvement in quality of life after surgery while the remaining 13 patients with a preoperative PFIQ-7 above 20 were improved. Our results are in accordance with those of Lawndy et al [33] showing that even if no difference was observed in anatomical results, some patients reported the absence of symptoms improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In line with the ICIQ‐VS results, the PGII showed a high success rate at 6 months after prolapse surgery and increased further at 12 months. This level of PGII success is in line with other reported studies …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There is no consensus regarding the best method of outcome assessment of POP surgery, but the achievement of patient-oriented goals gains importance [ 6 , 7 ]. Traditional physician-determined measures of treatment success appeared to be insufficient to determine the quality of surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction [ 7 9 ]; this may be explained by the fact that surgeons and patients had different goals and expectations on the outcomes of surgery [ 10 ]. This has led to the introduction of disease-specific QoL questionnaires in order to determine the quality of surgical outcomes in a more patient-oriented manner [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%