2022
DOI: 10.1002/for.2930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which factors drive Bitcoin volatility: Macroeconomic, technical, or both?

Abstract: Academic research relies heavily on exogenous drivers to improve the forecasting accuracy of Bitcoin volatility. The present study provides additional insight into the role of both macroeconomic and technical indicators in forecasting the realized volatility of Bitcoin. Using 17 famous macroeconomic variables and 18 technical indicators between December 2011 and April 2021, the results reveal that the shrinkage methods, including elastic net and LASSO, can powerfully extract predictive information from macroec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elsayed et al ( 2022 ), Jiang et al ( 2022 ), Maghyereh and Abdoh ( 2022 ), and Akyildirim et al ( 2021 ) have all documented significant volatility links between aggregate stock market returns and the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the majority of previous studies have attempted to explain Bitcoin volatility (see, e.g., Walther et al 2019 ; D’Amato et al 2022 ; Sapkota 2022 ; Wang et al 2022 ) or focused on the predictability of major cryptocurrencies and the profitability of trading strategies using machine learning techniques (Sebastião and Godinho 2021 ), 6 whereas our paper has a different scope by focusing on Bitcoin price ability to predict stock volatility. The second line of investigation focuses on Bitcoin and sectoral stock indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsayed et al ( 2022 ), Jiang et al ( 2022 ), Maghyereh and Abdoh ( 2022 ), and Akyildirim et al ( 2021 ) have all documented significant volatility links between aggregate stock market returns and the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the majority of previous studies have attempted to explain Bitcoin volatility (see, e.g., Walther et al 2019 ; D’Amato et al 2022 ; Sapkota 2022 ; Wang et al 2022 ) or focused on the predictability of major cryptocurrencies and the profitability of trading strategies using machine learning techniques (Sebastião and Godinho 2021 ), 6 whereas our paper has a different scope by focusing on Bitcoin price ability to predict stock volatility. The second line of investigation focuses on Bitcoin and sectoral stock indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of this study indicate a time-dependent downside risk spillover between Bitcoin and four assets (currencies, equities, commodities and bonds). In another study, Wang et al (2023) Most recently Yousaf et al (2023) explored the diversification, safe haven and hedging properties of FAANA (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Alphabet) stocks against four alternative assets (US Treasury bonds, gold, US Dollar/CHF and Bitcoin). The findings showed majority of FAANA stocks as weak/strong safe havens against Bitcoin, gold, Treasury bonds and Dollar/CHF.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of this study indicate a time‐dependent downside risk spillover between Bitcoin and four assets (currencies, equities, commodities and bonds). In another study, Wang et al (2023) investigate the role of technical and macroeconomic indicators in forecasting the realized volatility of Bitcoin. Adopting 18 technical indicators and 17 macroeconomic variables, the findings suggest that the macroeconomic indicators (S&P 500 realized volatility, global real economic activity index, and trade‐weighted USD index return) have a stronger ability to forecast Bitcoin volatility than that of technical indicators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations