Which factors predict case management services and how do these services relate to client outcomes?

Hopkins, Melonie; Ramsundar, Nadia

doi:10.2975/29.2006.219.222

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All included clinician-rated measures of functioning. Four associations (3 coded as bivariate, 1 as multivariate) related to global assessments of functioning [1,16,20], 2 of which were statistically significant [16,20]. One study used clinician and patient ratings of the TR and reported 2 associations with measures of occupational functioning [19].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The substantial exclusions at this stage were due to a large number of studies that had assessed the TR, but not studied it as a predictor of subsequent outcome. Finally, 9 [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] of the 33 relevant papers were found to meet all inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The search process is summarised in figure 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five associations were reported between the TR and patient-rated symptoms. Only 1 of them was in the hypothesised direction [20] and obtained marginal statistical significance.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The included studies either (i) measured the TR at baseline and predicted the symptoms/functioning at a later point in time and/or the readmissions or days of hospitalisation between baseline and follow-up assessments [15,18,22], or (ii) tested the TR as a predictor of change in symptoms/functioning after having controlled for (a) the same measure at baseline [14,17,18,21] and/or (b) a combination of constructs in a multivariate analysis [17,18], or (iii) tested the correlation of the TR with computed change scores of symptoms/functioning [16,19,20]. Three different types of effect size estimates were reported: correlations (r), standardised betas (β) and F values (F).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies were located [16,17,19,20] assessing associations between the TR and measures of functioning, reporting a total of 6 associations. All included clinician-rated measures of functioning.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic Review

Priebe¹,

Richardson²,

Cooney³

et al. 2010

Psychother Psychosom

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Numerous studies have shown that the quality of the therapeutic relationship (TR) between the patient and the clinician is an important predictor of the outcome of different forms of psychotherapy. It is less clear whether the TR also predicts outcomes of psychiatric treatment programmes in patients with psychosis (i.e. outside conventional psychotherapy). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and identified 9 primary studies that prospectively tested the association of the TR with 3 outcomes, i.e. hospitalisation, symptom levels and functioning. Because of the heterogeneity of the methods used, a meta-analysis was not feasible. A vote counting method was used to determine the number of statistically significant effects in the hypothesised direction (i.e. that a more positive TR predicts more favourable outcomes). Results: For each outcome, a χ² analysis showed that the number of statistically significant findings in the hypothesised direction was greater than expected if the null hypothesis of no association were true. However, studies had methodological shortcomings, and the effect sizes of positive associations were rather small. Conclusion: It may be concluded that there is some, but not overwhelming, evidence that the TR predicts outcomes of complex psychiatric treatment programmes in patients with psychosis, and that methodologically more rigorous research is required. Such research should measure the TR at initial stages of treatment and use validated assessment instruments for both TR and outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five associations were reported between the TR and patient-rated symptoms. Only 1 of them was in the hypothesised direction [20] and obtained marginal statistical significance.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic Review

Priebe¹,

Richardson²,

Cooney³

et al. 2010

Psychother Psychosom

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Homeless people's recovery in Housing First and Traditional Services: The role of working alliance in Italian housing services

Curiale

Lenzi

Gaboardi

et al. 2023

Journal Community Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to investigate whether a working alliance could represent a potential mechanism that explains the effectiveness of housing services in terms of user recovery, comparing the Housing First (HF) model with Traditional Services (TS). This study included 59 homeless service users in Italy (29 = HF; 30 = TS). Recovery was assessed upon entering the study (T0) and after 10 months (T1). Results indicate that participants inserted in HF services were more likely to report stronger working alliances with social service providers at T0 that, in turn, was directly associated with higher levels of users' recovery at the beginning of the study and indirectly (through recovery at T0) with recovery at T1. Implications of the results are discussed with respect to research and practice on homeless services.

show abstract

Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review

Kidd

Davidson

McKenzie³

2017

Community Ment Health J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While there is considerable research and commentary devoted to common factors in psychotherapy, their implications for community mental health interventions are much less clear. In response, a scoping review was conducted to answer the question, 'What is the evidence base for common factors in community mental health intervention?' A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar was completed. A total of 60 publications were identified in this review with a focus primarily upon therapeutic alliance. Though methodologically diverse, this review supports the likely importance of alliance in the outcomes of community mental health interventions.

show abstract

Which factors predict case management services and how do these services relate to client outcomes?

Cited by 19 publications

References 17 publications

Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic Review

Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic Review

Homeless people's recovery in Housing First and Traditional Services: The role of working alliance in Italian housing services

Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About