2016
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which future for circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of acute myocardial infarction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the use of miR-19a in different types of MI may act more effectively than traditional tests for patients with few symptoms at early stages of MI for strict diagnostic approaches. Therefore, predictive biomarkers for the development of targeted therapies and novel therapeutic methods for early diagnosis of AMI should be identified (Goretti and Devaux, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the use of miR-19a in different types of MI may act more effectively than traditional tests for patients with few symptoms at early stages of MI for strict diagnostic approaches. Therefore, predictive biomarkers for the development of targeted therapies and novel therapeutic methods for early diagnosis of AMI should be identified (Goretti and Devaux, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTn I and other laboratory tests are considered as the acceptable routine tests in clinical settings by cardiologists for accurate diagnosis, however these test are associated with several limitations (Fichtlscherer et al, 2011). The level of CTn I can be increased 8 h after MI and it also can be raised in the liver and end-stage renal diseases, which results in a delay in diagnosis and affects the effective treatment (Li et al, 2014;Goretti and Devaux, 2016). Accordingly, these tests have no specificity and also are poor predictors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More efforts have focused on miRNAs in cancer as they were first observed in cancer cell lines [83,84,85,86,87] and so far “liquid biopsy” was conceived as a way to make a complete profiling of a cancer disease from a drop of blood [88,89,90]. More recent evidence widens the applicability of miRNAs as biomarker also for other diseases [91,92,93].…”
Section: Microgels and Hydrogel Microparticles In Multiplex Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29, 30 These findings, however, have yet to be translated to the clinical setting, and the majority of studies have so far failed to show superiority of miRNA-based biomarkers over traditional risk factors such as troponin. 31 Additionally, miRNAs exhibit impressively pleiotropic effects, impacting expression of multiple genes in a variety of tissues, posing the challenge of specificity for any potential therapies. Even more interestingly, miRNAs (specifically miR33a/b) play a role in interactions between three genes that have previously emerged on methylome-wide screens for plasma lipids ( CPT1A , ABCG1 , and SREBF1 ), 27 illustrating the necessity of analytic approaches that integrate across –omics layers for a fuller understanding of complex traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%