ObjectiveThe choice of a stable reference gene plays a crucial role in gene expression analysis. In most cases, the choice of housekeeping gene (HKG) is quite random. However, the expression of HKGs varies under different experimental conditions and in different tissues.MethodsThe study focused on three reference genes in Catla Labeo catla—beta actin (β‐actin), glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and elongation factor‐1 alpha (EF‐1α)—under four experimental conditions: bacterial challenge, hypoxia, a combination of bacterial challenge and hypoxia, and control. The fish were subjected to the above‐mentioned experimental circumstances, and five tissues (blood, gill, liver, kidney, and spleen) were collected at regular intervals.ResultThe investigation of gene expression in the five tissues was performed using real‐time (RT) quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and the resultant cycle threshold values were subjected to several statistical techniques via the RefFinder tool to determine the most stable HKG. The results were ordered in accordance with the stability of the reference genes. In this study, GAPDH was found to be the least stable gene, while β‐actin and EF‐1α remained stable in the kidney and liver under various circumstances. Other tissues demonstrated tissue‐ and treatment‐specific stability for the various HKGs.ConclusionThe findings indicate that GAPDH should be avoided in Catla for gene expression studies and that different algorithms should be employed to validate the stability of HKGs in RT‐qPCR analysis.