Which Ideas for Change Are Endorsed? How Agentic and Communal Voice Affects Endorsement Differently for Men and for Women

McClean, Elizabeth; Kim, Sijun; Martínez, Tomás Mariano Calvo

doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0492

Cited by 38 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding demonstrates that situational factors (i.e., hindrance stressor) and employees' characteristics (i.e., work-based construal level) can determine the effect of prohibitive voice on communication effectiveness. In support of our findings, previous voice literature also documented that there were many moderators which can change the outcomes of voice behavior (e.g., Brykman and Raver, 2021 ; Hung et al., 2012 ; McClean et al., 2022 ; Yang, 2020 ). For instance, Yang's (2020) empirical research showed that prevention regulatory focus fit can enhance the positive association between prohibitive voice and safety performance.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level

Chen

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level

Chen

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Our work also highlights the way in which employee daily depletion can exert a negative effect on managerial responses to voice. There is a burgeoning body of literature concerning elements that predict voice endorsement (Burris, 2012; Lam et al, 2019; Li et al, 2019), which include voice types (Burris, 2012; McClean et al, in press), voice content (Burris et al, 2017), employee characteristics (Johnson & Johnson, 2017; Lam et al, 2019; Liao et al, 2021), and managerial characteristics (Li et al, 2019; Popelnukha et al, 2021). We build on this line of research by showing that employee depletion and trait self‐control may interact to influence the extent to which managers endorse employee voice through reduced daily voice impulse control.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

More depleted, speak up more? A daily examination of the benefit and cost of depletion for voice behavior and voice endorsement

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although extant work has found that employee depletion is associated with less voice behavior, an emerging line of research suggests that depletion may sometimes be associated with more voice behavior. We build on this emerging line of research by establishing when and why employee depletion is associated with more voice behavior on a daily basis. We then further identify the implications of these relationships for daily voice endorsement by managers. Integrating research on the strength model of self-control and the resource distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice, we predict that, among employees with low levels of trait self-control, higher levels of daily depletion will be associated with lower levels of daily voice impulse control. In turn, lower levels of daily voice impulse control will be associated with higher levels of daily prohibitive voice, but lower levels of daily voice endorsement.Results from a 10-day daily study with 697 daily observations from 88 employees working for 50 managers (Study 1) and an experimental recall task with 136 full-time employees (Study 2) supported our hypotheses. We discuss how our findings contribute to theories of voice and self-control, review the methodological strengths and limitations of our studies, and expound on the practical implications of our results.

show abstract

“…For example, affiliative citizenship behaviors, such as helping and showing courtesy towards others (Cheung et al, 2018;Grant and Mayer, 2009), may facilitate intraorganizational coordination and help to win and sustain clients. Challenging citizenship behaviors, such as voicing concern and taking charge to sell important issues (McClean et al, 2021;Van Dyne and LePine, 1998), can assist firms in tackling unforeseen problems.…”

Section: Theory Development Citizenship Behaviors In New Venture Teamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizenship behavior and new venture survival: a cultural tightness-looseness capabilities lens

Pidduck

Kelemen

Bolino

2022

IJEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe authors advance a model theorizing how new ventures elicit citizenship behaviors to cultivate dynamic capabilities that help bolster survival in their nascent years of operations—a characteristically resource-scarce and turbulent context.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on and integrating research on citizenship behaviors with dynamic capabilities, the authors develop a theory that new ventures that are better able to evoke a combination of affiliative and challenging citizenship behaviors from their wider entrepreneurial team (i.e. internal, and external stakeholders) are more adept at mitigating the liabilities of smallness and newness. As these behaviors are spontaneous and not explicitly remunerated, new ventures become stronger at utilizing their limited resource base for remaining lean and agile. Further, key boundary conditions are theorized that the sociocultural norms the venture is embedded within serve to heighten/attenuate the degree to which entrepreneurs can effectively cultivate dynamic capabilities from their team's “extra mile” behaviors.FindingsThe propositions extend a rich body of research on citizenship behaviors into the new venture domain. As all new ventures face the challenge of overcoming liabilities of newness, models that help understand why some are more adept at overcoming this and why others fail, hold substantive practical utility.Originality/valueThis research is the first to unpack how citizenship behaviors manifest among an extended range of stakeholders traditionally overlooked in new venture teams research and the mechanism for how this links to venture survival.

show abstract

Which Ideas for Change Are Endorsed? How Agentic and Communal Voice Affects Endorsement Differently for Men and for Women

Cited by 38 publications

References 81 publications

When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level

When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level

More depleted, speak up more? A daily examination of the benefit and cost of depletion for voice behavior and voice endorsement

Citizenship behavior and new venture survival: a cultural tightness-looseness capabilities lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About