Which is the best protocol of the sit-to-stand test in patients with COPD?

Morita, Andrea Akemi; Bisca, Gianna Waldrich; Paes, Thaís; Furlanetto, Karina Couto; Sant’Anna, Thaís; Schneider, Lorena Paltanin; Donária, Leila; Nellessen, Aline Gonçalves; Travassos, Andreia; Hernandes, Nídia A.; Pitta, Fábio; Probst, Vanessa S.

doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.pa2078

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, as seen in table 3, although HR and SBP showed significant statistical increase, it did not lead patients to present an exacerbated response concerning cardiac and respiratory variables. This finding is similar to that found in a study by Morita et al, ( 22 ) which compared 3 sit-to-stand test (5 reps, 30 seconds and 1 minute) modalities and found that marked changes in SPO 2 , HR, blood pressure, dyspnea and leg fatigue were only found after the 1 minute type.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…( 26 ) In comparison with these results, in the current research, the mean time of the test was higher (14.98 ± 9.6 s) than for community-based individuals of a similar age group. ( 22 ) Several factors such as chair height, muscle force, use of footwear and trunk, knee and foot position are considered determinants of the sit-to-stand movement and thus influence performance. ( 27 ) Moreover, factors including bed rest during hospitalization, malnutrition, isolation, decrease in muscle mass and other physiologic changes related to bed rest, contributed to overall weakness ( 28 ) and hence, poorer performance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge

Melo¹,

Duarte²,

Bezerra³

et al. 2019

Revista Brasileira De Terapia Intensiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Methods Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot. Results The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99). Conclusion The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%