Perceptual Experience 2006
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which Properties are Represented in Perception?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
244
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
244
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…I think this is incorrect. My view on this matter isn t novel some have argued that there is a relatively weak interpretation of the claim that experience has content that Naïve Realists can and should accept (see Siegel 2010 andSchellenberg 2011 But ) differ with previous compatibilists on two issues. First, pace Siegel and Schellenberg, I think there is an argument for the claim that experience has content in the weak sense that is more effective than the ones hitherto offered.…”
Section: Experiential Content and Naïve Realism: A Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I think this is incorrect. My view on this matter isn t novel some have argued that there is a relatively weak interpretation of the claim that experience has content that Naïve Realists can and should accept (see Siegel 2010 andSchellenberg 2011 But ) differ with previous compatibilists on two issues. First, pace Siegel and Schellenberg, I think there is an argument for the claim that experience has content in the weak sense that is more effective than the ones hitherto offered.…”
Section: Experiential Content and Naïve Realism: A Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, one could hold that locutions of the form it appears to S that p are potentially ambiguous, sometimes picking out epistemic appearances and sometimes picking out perceptual appearances )f that s right then the debate is not trivial as I will argue in section 3, it boils down to a debate over whether there is a kind of perceptual appearance that it appears to S that p is used to pick out Thanks to Adam Pautz for pressing me to clarify this point.) 4 (ere s how the taxonomy of views ) ve just offered relates to some of the others in the literature: Susanna Siegel (2010) If perceptual experience has content in any of these three senses, there are a number of matters arising. To name just a few: first, as I hinted in the discussion of the notion of non-propositional experiential content, we must determine the nature of the propositions that can be experiential contents e.g., whether they are Fregean-style propositions composed of senses, Russellianstyle ordered pairs of objects and relations, or perhaps coarse-grained sets of possible worlds.…”
Section: Let Us Call Claims (I) -(Iii) the Medium Content Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, a general identity is attributed by virtue of perceptually representing an object as having a kind-property like ''being a pine tree'' or ''being a tiger'' (e.g. Siegel 2006). It is believed that such a type of perceptual recognition is largely independent from background knowledge.…”
Section: Determination Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most systematic contribution to the study of perceptual phenomenal intentionality is due to Susanna Siegel (2005Siegel ( , 2006a, who argues that high-level properties are represented in perception. ese include causation, meaning, and kind properties.…”
Section: E Scope Of Phenomenal Intentionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%