2016
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which strings attached: ethical considerations for selecting appropriate conditionalities in conditional cash transfer programmes

Abstract: Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) present a promising approach to simultaneously tackle chronic poverty and poor health. While these programmes clearly embody beneficent aims, questions remain regarding the ethical design of CCTs. Limited guidance exists for the ethical evaluation of the defining feature of these programmes: the conditionalities. Drawing upon prominent public health ethics frameworks and social justice theories, this paper outlines five categories of morally relevant considerations that CCT pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They rather requested the government to explore other forms of incentives as they believed that memories of the N5000 (USD30) cash incentive would not last as much as the benefits of a proper economic empowerment programme such as skills acquisition/vocational trainings. The CCT programme had a high degree of receptivity by beneficiaries as consistent with conditionalities for consideration, and all stakeholders were appreciative of the scheme. However, all three stakeholders were disappointed that beneficiaries who had complications during their care could not access free referral services at the general hospitals during emergencies as earlier promised by the intervention following programmatic challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rather requested the government to explore other forms of incentives as they believed that memories of the N5000 (USD30) cash incentive would not last as much as the benefits of a proper economic empowerment programme such as skills acquisition/vocational trainings. The CCT programme had a high degree of receptivity by beneficiaries as consistent with conditionalities for consideration, and all stakeholders were appreciative of the scheme. However, all three stakeholders were disappointed that beneficiaries who had complications during their care could not access free referral services at the general hospitals during emergencies as earlier promised by the intervention following programmatic challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other economic-based interventions should be assessed similarly from an ethics perspective, and choose carefully the conditionality. 43 , 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one participant wrote, “It started out that the money was the reason I got involved. Then the programs instruction and leaders were the reason I continued to come back.” This comment highlights the ethical importance of matching the incentive to participation in a program that (a) participants value, (b) has been demonstrated to improve health outcomes in the target population (i.e., low-income families, families of color), (c) is open to all parents in the grade, thereby limiting any stigma associated with participation, and (d) is linked to long-term benefits to families and society (Krubiner and Merritt 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%