Whistlestop tour

Cassell, JA

doi:10.1136/sti.2010.042457

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…predict the potential spread of global infectious pandemics and patterns of climate change). These methods, however, have also had epidemiological applications to chronic disease (Ness et al 2007 ), Human Immunodeficiency Virus transmission and prevention (Aral et al 2010 ; Marshall et al 2012 ), substance-abuse (Moore et al 2009 ; Gordon et al 2006 ), physical inactivity (Yang et al 2011 ), and dietary practices (Auchincloss et al 2013 ). In terms of injury, System Dynamic modelling has been discussed as a way to strengthen the understanding of upstream activities in order to identify key political leverage points for injury prevention purposes (Ferencik and Minyard 2011 ).…”

Section: Proposing a Complementary Research Agenda For Sports Injury mentioning

confidence: 99%

From monocausality to systems thinking: a complementary and alternative conceptual approach for better understanding the development and prevention of sports injury

Hulme

Finch

2015

Inj. Epidemiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The science of sports injury control, including both its cause and prevention, has largely been informed by a biomedical and mechanistic model of health. Traditional scientific practice in sports injury research has routinely involved collapsing the broader socioecological landscape down in order to analyse individual-level determinants of injury - whether biomechanical and/or behavioural. This approach has made key gains for sports injury prevention research and should be further encouraged and allowed to evolve naturally. However, the public health, Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, and injury epidemiological literature more broadly, has accepted the value of a socioecological paradigm for better understanding disease and injury processes, and sports injury research will fall further behind unless it does the same. A complementary and alternative conceptual approach towards injury control known as systems thinking that builds on socioecological science, both methodologically and analytically, is readily available and fast developing in other research areas. This review outlines the historical progression of causal concepts in the field of epidemiology over the course of the modern scientific era. From here, causal concepts in injury epidemiology, and models of aetiology as found in the context of sports injury research are presented. The paper finishes by proposing a new research agenda that considers the potential for a systems thinking approach to further enhance sports injury aetiological understanding. A complementary systems paradigm, however, will require that sports injury epidemiologists bring their knowledge and skillsets forwards in an attempt to use, adapt, and even refine existing systems-based approaches. Alongside the natural development of conventional scientific methodologies and analyses in sports injury research, progressing forwards to a systems paradigm is now required.

show abstract