2008
DOI: 10.1364/ao.47.002941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White-light interferometry on rough surfaces--measurement uncertainty caused by surface roughness

Abstract: White-light interferometry measuring an optically rough surface commonly does not resolve the lateral structure of the surface. This means that there are height differences within one resolution cell that exceed one-fourth of the wavelength of the light used. Thus the following questions arise: Which height is measured by white-light interferometry? How does the surface roughness affect the measurement uncertainty? The goal of the presented paper is to answer these questions by means of numerical simulations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition there is a high frequency of missing data in the profiles, probably due to the incident light angles being such that the light is not returned to the sensor. These issues have been documented in the literature [9].…”
Section: Surface Texture Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition there is a high frequency of missing data in the profiles, probably due to the incident light angles being such that the light is not returned to the sensor. These issues have been documented in the literature [9].…”
Section: Surface Texture Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this work, we consider two influences that cause the measurement uncertainty: rough surface and the shot noise of the camera. The influence of rough surface on measurement uncertainty was described in our previous work (Pavlíček & Hýbl, 2008). It shows that the measurement uncertainty caused by surface roughness depends on the roughness and the intensity of individual speckle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…3. The limit beyond which the correlogram becomes distorted was found numerically (Pavlíček & Hýbl, 2008) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations