2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White light reflectance spectroscopy biosensing system for fast quantitative prostate specific antigen determination in forensic samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 7a, the CRP calibration curves obtained using chips modified with 2% The stability of the anti-CRP antibodies immobilized onto chips modified with APTES following different protocols was also tested through the performance of repeated cycles of immunoreactions and surface regeneration, that is, removal of immune complexes formed during the assay. For surface regeneration, a 0.1 M glycine-HCl buffer, pH 2.5, was used, which has been determined as optimal for this particular antibody in previous publications (Koukouvinos et al, 2018;Koukouvinos, Metheniti, et al, 2017;Koukouvinos, Τsialla, et al, 2017). The results obtained from chips modified with 2% ( F I G U R E 7 (a) Typical CRP calibration curves obtained from chips modified with 2% (v/v) APTES in water (black squares), 5% (v/v) APTES in ethanol (red squares) and 5% (v/v) APTES in ethanol and glutaraldehyde (blue squares).…”
Section: Development Of Wlrs Sensor For the Immunochemical Determinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 7a, the CRP calibration curves obtained using chips modified with 2% The stability of the anti-CRP antibodies immobilized onto chips modified with APTES following different protocols was also tested through the performance of repeated cycles of immunoreactions and surface regeneration, that is, removal of immune complexes formed during the assay. For surface regeneration, a 0.1 M glycine-HCl buffer, pH 2.5, was used, which has been determined as optimal for this particular antibody in previous publications (Koukouvinos et al, 2018;Koukouvinos, Metheniti, et al, 2017;Koukouvinos, Τsialla, et al, 2017). The results obtained from chips modified with 2% ( F I G U R E 7 (a) Typical CRP calibration curves obtained from chips modified with 2% (v/v) APTES in water (black squares), 5% (v/v) APTES in ethanol (red squares) and 5% (v/v) APTES in ethanol and glutaraldehyde (blue squares).…”
Section: Development Of Wlrs Sensor For the Immunochemical Determinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significant reduction of the assay time was attributed to the shrinkage of the fluidic cell dimensions (form 100 μL to 20 μL) that allowed for quicker diffusion of the reagents towards the immobilized probe molecules. This fast PSA assay was implemented to determine PSA concentration in forensic cases samples, including swabs and fabrics collected by alleged crime scenes (mainly alleged rape cases) [ 56 ]. The results were compared with a semi-quantitative immunochromatographic strip currently used by forensic labs for PSA detection, and the presence or absence of semen was verified by microscopic detection of spermatozoa and male DNA identification through Y chromosome detection.…”
Section: System Development and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, several analytical techniques have been developed for determination of PSA and Myo individually. These include chromatography [8,9], mass spectroscopy [10,11], fluorescence spectroscopy [12,13], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [14,15], white light reflectance spectroscopy [16,17], capillary electrophoresis [18], chemiluminescence [19], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [20,21], electrochemiluminescence [22,23], radioimmunoassay [24,25], time-resolved immunofluorometric assay [26], surface plasmon fluorescence immunoassay [27], bioluminescent immunoassay [28], electrochemical [29], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [24,30] and microcantilever method [31]. Of these methods, biosensors especially electrochemical types can offer some advantages in contrast to the commonly used sensing tools, including simultaneous analysis of biomarkers, capability of miniaturization, lower cost and simplicity of analysis [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%