1998
DOI: 10.1159/000007921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Matter Changes on CT and MRI: An Overview of Visual Rating Scales

Abstract: Since the recognition of white matter changes on CT (leukoaraiosis), rating scales for the location and severity of white matter changes have been developed, mainly for research purposes, to investigate factors such as the relation with cognition, risk factors, and pathology. The main purpose of rating scales is to provide scores that can be used in statistical analyses. The development of the NINDS-AIREN criteria for vascular dementia have introduced a new application for these rating scales in investigating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
175
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
175
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to identify subjects with incipient primary degenerative dementia, usuallyAD, a tentative diagnosis of primary degenerative MCI was made at the occurrence of symptoms of MCI, no more Neuropsychology of MCI with Alzheimer-typical CSF 583 than one vascular risk factor without complications and no or insignificant findings on brain imaging.All subjects underwent brain MRI scans, which were evaluated by experienced neuroradiologists. For primary degenerative MCI only insignificant (5mild) white matter changes on a 4-grade scale (Scheltens et al, 1998) and0or few lacunes (,3) or absence of cerebrovascular changes were allowed. Subjects with vascular disease (arterial hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, angina pectoris, cardiac rhythm disturbance, cardiac infarction, TIA, stroke, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, or peripheral vessel disease) and significant (5moderate or severe) white matter changes0several lacunes and0or signs of infarctions according to visually assessed brain imaging were considered MCI of vascular aetiology.…”
Section: Subjects and Diagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify subjects with incipient primary degenerative dementia, usuallyAD, a tentative diagnosis of primary degenerative MCI was made at the occurrence of symptoms of MCI, no more Neuropsychology of MCI with Alzheimer-typical CSF 583 than one vascular risk factor without complications and no or insignificant findings on brain imaging.All subjects underwent brain MRI scans, which were evaluated by experienced neuroradiologists. For primary degenerative MCI only insignificant (5mild) white matter changes on a 4-grade scale (Scheltens et al, 1998) and0or few lacunes (,3) or absence of cerebrovascular changes were allowed. Subjects with vascular disease (arterial hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, angina pectoris, cardiac rhythm disturbance, cardiac infarction, TIA, stroke, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, or peripheral vessel disease) and significant (5moderate or severe) white matter changes0several lacunes and0or signs of infarctions according to visually assessed brain imaging were considered MCI of vascular aetiology.…”
Section: Subjects and Diagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Improved methods to quantify WML subtypes have become available and have been validated and studied in large population samples. 23 For example, based on a strict WML scoring protocol, periventricular WML (pWML) were associated with lower psychomotor speed and general cognitive function in 1077 individuals from the Rotterdam scan study, aged 60 years and older, 24 while subcortical WML (sWML) were related with depressed mood. 25 In addition, pWML were associated with a three-fold greater reduction in general cognitive functioning (Mini-Mental State Examination) after a mean follow-up duration of 7.3 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slice thickness was 5-or 6 mm with an interslice gap of 1 or 1.2 mm. The evaluation of the MRI images was performed by a single reader using an established rating scale (Scheltens et al 1998;de Leeuw et al 2001). The detailed account of the reading protocol is publicized elsewhere (Launer et al 2000).…”
Section: Mri Scansmentioning
confidence: 99%