2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Matter Differences Among Adolescents Reporting Psychotic Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our finding of increased mean FA in schizophrenia offspring as compared with control adolescents may be in line with one study in adolescent offspring of schizophrenia patients (age range 9-18 years) reporting on increased volumetric measures of subcortical regions across age (Dougherty et al, 2012). Interestingly, a recent population-based case-control study showed that adolescents who reported subclinical psychotic symptoms also had increased FA in striatal regions (O'Hanlon et al, 2015). Although these individuals, in contrast to offspring, are not selected based on a genetic vulnerability, they are clearly at increased risk for developing schizophrenia as they display subclinical psychotic symptoms (Yung et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our finding of increased mean FA in schizophrenia offspring as compared with control adolescents may be in line with one study in adolescent offspring of schizophrenia patients (age range 9-18 years) reporting on increased volumetric measures of subcortical regions across age (Dougherty et al, 2012). Interestingly, a recent population-based case-control study showed that adolescents who reported subclinical psychotic symptoms also had increased FA in striatal regions (O'Hanlon et al, 2015). Although these individuals, in contrast to offspring, are not selected based on a genetic vulnerability, they are clearly at increased risk for developing schizophrenia as they display subclinical psychotic symptoms (Yung et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result suggests that genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia (negatively) impacts frontostriatal network function during adolescence. However, to date, no DTI studies have been performed to investigate the impact of this genetic vulnerability on structural frontostriatal tracts in adolescence, although there is one study that reported increased FA values in the striatum in clinical at-risk adolescents who report psychotic experiences (O'Hanlon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subclinical manifestations of most mental health disorders exist in the general population, including in children and adolescents (White, 2015), and neuroimaging population studies and studies of children and adolescents with subclinical symptoms are not only important for understanding risk-factors or early manifestations of disorders, but also appear to support a dimensional perspective on several brain phenotypes associated with mental health. For example, individuals showing subclinical symptoms for psychosis spectrum disorders (clinical high-risk) and individuals with diagnosed relatives (genetic high-risk) have brain microstructural changes at least somewhat overlapping with those reported in clinical groups (Arat et al, 2015;O'Hanlon et al, 2015;Peters & Karlsgodt, 2015), and a recent longitudinal study showed how higher levels of anxiety and depression symptoms was associated with regionally reduced rates of FA development in typically developing youth (Albaugh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Individual Differences and Atypical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One key point shared between these methods is that they both require some form of correspondence between the studied structure of interest for each subjects, either by spatial registration to align the delineated ROIs (Froeling et al, 2016;Smith et al, 2006) or along the streamlines by resampling to a common number of points (Colby et al, 2012;Yeatman et al, 2012). Tractography based approaches can analyze the voxels traversed by a specific white matter bundle in a data driven way and reveal subtle local changes inside a bundle, while ROI based analysis discards the 3D spatial information but reveal widespread changes in the bundle (O'Hanlon et al, 2015). For tractography based analysis, metrics are either averaged by using all points forming a common bundle (Wakana et al, 2007) or collapsed as a representative pathway of the bundle (Colby et al, 2012;Cousineau et al, 2017;Yeatman et al, 2012) to study changes in scalar values along its length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%