2021
DOI: 10.1089/brain.2020.0921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White-Matter Neuroanatomical Predictors of Aphasic Verb Retrieval

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are the first to consider the contribution of all right hemisphere WM tracts across the recovery profile. Previous research has investigated these contributions cross‐sectionally, in the early subacute phase (Forkel et al, 2014 ) or in the chronic phase of recovery (Dresang et al, 2021 ; Fleming et al, 2020 ; Fridriksson et al, 2013 ; Hula et al, 2020 ; Kourtidou et al, 2021 ; Marchina et al, 2011 ). Keser et al ( 2020 ) investigated the longitudinal contribution of two right hemisphere WM tracts to language recovery after stroke in 10 stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are the first to consider the contribution of all right hemisphere WM tracts across the recovery profile. Previous research has investigated these contributions cross‐sectionally, in the early subacute phase (Forkel et al, 2014 ) or in the chronic phase of recovery (Dresang et al, 2021 ; Fleming et al, 2020 ; Fridriksson et al, 2013 ; Hula et al, 2020 ; Kourtidou et al, 2021 ; Marchina et al, 2011 ). Keser et al ( 2020 ) investigated the longitudinal contribution of two right hemisphere WM tracts to language recovery after stroke in 10 stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this methodology, the discordant results observed in studies to date (Fridriksson et al, 2013 ; Keser et al, 2020 ; Marchina et al, 2011 ), which have used mean FA to investigate the contribution of a single tract associated with language production, may be explained by a combination of (a) the aspect of language being assessed, (b) the recovery phase being investigated, and (c) the task used to assess language. By adopting a connectometry approach, we have added to the growing evidence of the contribution of WM tracts outside the homologous language pathways to predicting better language outcome in aphasia (Dresang et al, 2021 ; Hula et al, 2020 ; Pani et al, 2016 ). It must be acknowledged that recovery among individuals with aphasia remains highly variable, depending on the site and volume of stroke as well as brain reserve and other variables (Kiran & Thompson, 2019 ), and therefore, given that the sample sizes remain modest in both the present and previously published studies focusing on right hemispheric structural connectivity in aphasia recovery (Forkel et al, 2014 ; Keser et al, 2020 ; Pani et al, 2016 ), future larger‐scale studies are required to assess the out‐of‐sample predictive value of the current results and enable generalization to the wider aphasic population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, we carried out connectometry analysis utilizing quantitative anisotropy (QA), which has shown greater sensitivity than conventional single-tensor based or tract-based analysis (Yeh, Badre et al, 2016 ). Connectometry uses permutation testing to identify group differences in white matter tracts, and has recently been used to uncover white matter connectometry of word production (Hula et al, 2020 ) and verb retrieval (Dresang et al, 2021 ) in post-stroke aphasia. Based on the previous functional MRI results from the baseline (pre-intervention) stage of our trial, which showed that music listening activates bilateral frontotemporal, parietal, and subcortical regions in early subacute stage stroke patients (Sihvonen et al, 2017b ), we hypothesized that vocal music listening would induce longitudinal (baseline to 3-month stage) structural connectivity changes bilaterally in frontotemporal and parietal regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%