1995
DOI: 10.2307/1395332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0
18

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
123
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach applies a correction to standard errors in order to account for the presence of multiple effects from the same study (Hedges et al, 2010). We implemented this approach using the "robumeta" package in R (Fisher et al, 2017;Fisher & Tipton, 2015). This package allowed us to conduct a weighted, random-effects model metaregression using corrections described by Hedges et al (2010).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach applies a correction to standard errors in order to account for the presence of multiple effects from the same study (Hedges et al, 2010). We implemented this approach using the "robumeta" package in R (Fisher et al, 2017;Fisher & Tipton, 2015). This package allowed us to conduct a weighted, random-effects model metaregression using corrections described by Hedges et al (2010).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, upper year students do not differ from first years in their assessment of racism's role in the present and “reverse racism”—the belief that prejudicial treatment of White people is a problem. As scholars argue that one of the privileges of being racialized White is its invisibility (Frankenberg 1993; Lewis 2004), the racial systems that perpetuate the dominance of White people and the privileges of being racialized as White may not be addressed in the curriculum or in discussions of racial reconciliation. Therefore, White people's achievements may be celebrated in the main curriculum as the norm and thus be invisible, and once race becomes central, Whiteness nonetheless remains invisible in discussions of race.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We come into conversation recognizing that our experiences arising from the margins are sites of oppression and resistance and sites of knowledge for social transformation (Anzaldúa, 2007;hooks, 1984;Lugones, 2003). While White cultural dominance, through its unmarked normative position, is rendered invisible to those who inhabit it, it is visible to those who occupy the margins (Ahmed, 2006;Fisher & Sonn, 2007;Frankenberg, 1993;Lugones, 2003). Lugones (2003) explains that those with multiple and intersecting identities arising from experiences of and resistance to oppression give way to plural ontologies.…”
Section: Australian Social Relations Colonial Legacies and The Decolo...mentioning
confidence: 99%