2004
DOI: 10.1177/1094670504266131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whither Services Marketing?

Abstract: This article examines the received wisdom of services marketing and challenges the validity and continued usefulness of its core paradigm, namely, the assertion that four specific characteristics—intangibility, heterogeneity, inseparability, and perishability—make services uniquely different from goods. An alternative paradigm is proposed, based on the premise that marketing exchanges that do not result in a transfer of ownership from seller to buyer are fundamentally different from those that do. It posits th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
289
0
52

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 928 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
289
0
52
Order By: Relevance
“…The main distinction between goods and services is the indispensable involvement of the client in service supply [15,33,50]. The participation of the client in the service production process will influence the whole process of service provision, from specification of the desired services to actual service delivery.…”
Section: Operations Management In Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main distinction between goods and services is the indispensable involvement of the client in service supply [15,33,50]. The participation of the client in the service production process will influence the whole process of service provision, from specification of the desired services to actual service delivery.…”
Section: Operations Management In Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing stream in service research proposes nonownership as a key value proposition of service businesses for removing the burden of ownership from their clients (Ehret & Wirtz, 2010, 2015Lovelock & Gummesson, 2004;Wittkowski, Moeller & Wirtz, 2013;Wirtz & Ehret 2009). Some authors go even as far as to declare the death of ownership and the eclipse of capitalism (Rifkin, 2014).…”
Section: Research Opportunities In Iiot Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dimension of brand equity is brand image, the determinants of which are identified by drawing on Vorhies' (1997) service attributes, provider attributes and consumer attributes. The symbolic attributes include brand's social image and positioning in the market which are considered search qualities (Lovelock, 1991;Temple, 2006;Kurz , Scannell, and Veeder, 2008;Chen, 2008;Mourad, 2010;Paden and Stell, 2006) as well as brand personality which is considered to be a credence quality (Yoo, Donthu, and Lee, 2000).…”
Section: Service Brand Equity: a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these determinants are assessed after consumption of the service hence; they are experience qualities (Gabbott & Hogg, 1998;Teas & Grapentine, 1996). Other relevant provider attributes include location, country of origin, historical image and size which are classified as search qualities (Lovelock, 1991;Chen, 2008;Kurzetal, 2008).…”
Section: Service Brand Equity: a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%