Who are dying and why? A case series study of maternal deaths in Nepal

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify delays and associated factors for maternal deaths in Nepal.DesignA cross-sectional case series study of maternal deaths. An integrated verbal and social autopsy tool was used to collect quantitative and qualitative information regarding three delays. We recorded death accounts and conducted social autopsy by means of community Focus Group Discussions for each maternal death; and analysed data by framework analysis.SettingSixty-two maternal deaths in six districts in three provinces of Nepal.ResultsNearly half of the deceased women (45.2%) were primiparous and one-third had no formal education. About 40% were from Terai/Madhesi and 30.6% from lower caste. The most common place of death was private hospitals (41.9%), followed by public hospitals (29.1%). Nearly three-fourth cases were referred to higher health facilities and median time (IQR) of stay at the lower health facility was 120 (60–180) hours. Nearly half of deaths (43.5%) were attributable to more than one delay while first and third delay each contributed equally (25.8%). Lack of perceived need; perceived cost and low status; traditional beliefs and practices; physically inaccessible facilities and lack of service readiness and quality care were important factors in maternal deaths.ConclusionsThe first and third delays were the equal contributors of maternal deaths. Interventions related to birth preparedness, economic support and family planning need to be focused on poor and marginalised communities. Community management of quick transportation, early diagnosis of pregnancy risks, accommodation facilities near the referral hospitals and dedicated skilled manpower with adequate medicines, equipment and blood supplies in referral hospitals are needed for further reduction of maternal deaths in Nepal.

Role of digital health insurance management systems in scaling health insurance coverage in low- and Middle-Income Countries: A case study from Nigeria

“…The Abiye MCH initiative, piloted in only two healthcare facilities in two LGAs of Ondo State, aimed to address the four key phases of delay in access to maternal health care services. These are: (1) delay on the part of pregnant women to seek care when experience complications, (2) delay in reaching healthcare due to poor infrastructure support, communication challenges and transport, (3) delay in accessing care due to poor facilities or absence of health facilities, and (4) delay on the part of the health system to refer “at risk cases or emergencies” ( 60 ). The “incentives” component of the Abiye MCH initiative worked with local communities to register all pregnant women in the two LGAs and to provide maternity services free-of-cost to pregnant women to boost demand for maternity services.…”

Utilisation of quality antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services in Nepal: An analysis of Service Provision Assessment

“…This underscores the need for building HF capacity through system inputs, including trained health workers, equipment, medicine, supplies and protocols/guideline, infrastructure. Health system readiness/inputs are hindered by several supply-side barriers, including poor health system readiness and system governance, lack of health workforce accountability [ 68 , 69 ], including lack of adequate trained staff [ 70 ]. Therefore, program and policy efforts should focus on improved management and health governance systems for better HF capacity for quality MNH services.…”

Place of death and associated factors among reviewed maternal deaths in Ethiopia: a generalised structural equation modelling

“…The final case-based report has five distinct dimensions (reporting facility, socioeconomic status, medical history, cause of death (COD) and NMCOD) that provide a clear picture of the deceased woman. A hypothesised relationship was formulated for the variables based on literature review, plausibility of the relationship and the author’s experience related to the place of death 37 38. The proposed model was used to examine the effect of socioeconomic status, medical history and COD (medical and non-medical causes) on the place of death and possible mediation by residence (rural and urban) of the deceased women (figure 1).…”