2006
DOI: 10.1080/13696850600750327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who are the Luo? Oral tradition and disciplinary practices in anthropology and history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Luo people of Siaya district belong to the same ethnic group as the Acholi in the present study area in northern Uganda. Both the Acholi and Siaya share many common attributes such as ancestry, culture and language (Campbell, 2006) The Acholi sub-region experienced armed conflict for nearly two decades from around 1985 to 2005 (Durick 2013) between the Lord's resistance army and the Uganda peoples' defense forces. This conflict changed the traditional way of life in several ways including increased consumption of westernstyle relief foods, overexploitation of natural resources leading to their decline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Luo people of Siaya district belong to the same ethnic group as the Acholi in the present study area in northern Uganda. Both the Acholi and Siaya share many common attributes such as ancestry, culture and language (Campbell, 2006) The Acholi sub-region experienced armed conflict for nearly two decades from around 1985 to 2005 (Durick 2013) between the Lord's resistance army and the Uganda peoples' defense forces. This conflict changed the traditional way of life in several ways including increased consumption of westernstyle relief foods, overexploitation of natural resources leading to their decline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Gupta andFerguson 1997, 3;Sigona et al 2015, xix. Stories of 'the past in the present' (Allen 1988, 48;Jackson 1998, 2) have historically been employed as a methodology for understanding Luo and Acholi origins (Crazzolara 1950;Ogot 1967;Onyango-Ku-Odongo and Webster 1976;Atkinson 1994), which has been critiqued as speculative and 'futile' (Allen 2019;Allen 1991a;Campbell 2006;p'Bitek 1971) for obscuring the instability of the past and for failing to recognise that 'oral traditions are concerned … with the foundation and maintenance of existing institutions' (p 'Bitek 1970, 3), and '[l] egends whose proper function was to make the world intelligible have been read for history, the events related taken as if they actually took place' (p 'Bitek 1970, 11). As well as Acholi qualities 'emerging out of dialogue' with colonial administrators and missionaries, as highlighted in the earlier work of anthropologists Girling (Girling 2019(Girling [1960, 200) and p 'Bitek (1970), English-language scholarship has also recursively informed oral histories themselves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%