2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9610-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who are the Stakeholders Now? An Empirical Examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood Theory of Stakeholder Salience

Abstract: stakeholder theory, corporate social responsibility, legitimacy perspective,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
77
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that stakeholder attributes help to define the salience of a stakeholder. Hence, an understanding of stakeholder salience has significant effect in using stakeholder attributes such as influence and power, urgency, and legitimacy, which help in the process of identifying key or relevant stakeholders (Mitchell et al, 1997;Magness, 2008). Table 2 reveals the various attributes or elements that scholars have refer to since the pronouncement of stakeholder theory within management discipline (Clarkson 1995;Achterkamp & Vos, 2008).…”
Section: Stakeholder Salience and Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that stakeholder attributes help to define the salience of a stakeholder. Hence, an understanding of stakeholder salience has significant effect in using stakeholder attributes such as influence and power, urgency, and legitimacy, which help in the process of identifying key or relevant stakeholders (Mitchell et al, 1997;Magness, 2008). Table 2 reveals the various attributes or elements that scholars have refer to since the pronouncement of stakeholder theory within management discipline (Clarkson 1995;Achterkamp & Vos, 2008).…”
Section: Stakeholder Salience and Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Agency Theory (Ross, 1973), solving the conflict between managers and shareholders (Magness, 2008) is quite important in order to come to an agreement about the companies' strategic decisions.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility Financial Performance and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por lo tanto cuando se habla de la intensidad de los intentos de influencia de los grupos de interés de la organización sobre el líder, este concepto se puede entender como la relevancia que un grupo de interés puede tener sobre un líder. Así pues, en el diseño del cuestionario para valorar los atributos de los grupos de interés, se ha tomado como base el planteamiento de los atributos (poder, legitimidad y urgencia) propuesto por Mitchell et al (1997) y que ha sido validado por estudios recientes (Magness, 2008;Myllykangas et al, 2010); y con el objetivo de hacer congruente la medición con el modelo planteado en la fase 3, se incorpora la variable frecuencia de los intentos de influencia, que originalmente también fue sugerida por Homans (1961) al referirse a la intensidad y frecuencia de los intentos de influencia.…”
Section: Diseño Del Cuestionariounclassified