Who Are the Victims and Who Are the Perpetrators in Dating Violence? Sharing the Role of Victim and Perpetrator

Park, Sihyun; Kim, Sin‐Hyang

doi:10.1177/1524838017730648

Cited by 45 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A growing body of IPA literature, along with a meta-analysis of 25 peer-reviewed studies by Park and Kim (2019), have revealed that there is a significant overlap between IPA victimization and perpetration in most couples that experience violence. It suggests that some of the male and female victims have also perpetrated IPA.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Qualitative Study of the Male Victims’ Experiences With the Criminal Justice Response to Intimate Partner Abuse in Four English-Speaking Countries

Lysova¹,

Hanson

Hines

et al. 2020

Criminal Justice and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The criminal justice system plays a pivotal role in addressing the safety of victims of intimate partner abuse (IPA). Over the past 40 years, most changes in the criminal justice response to IPA have been made with the intention of improving support to abused women and their children. However, a growing body of research shows there are many men who are victims of IPA. This qualitative study explored the help-seeking experiences of 38 abused men within the criminal justice system in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Twelve online focus groups (three in each country) were conducted and themes were identified inductively at a semantic level. Thematic analysis identified that most of their experiences were negative and reflected the gender paradigm embedded in the criminal justice response. This study offers insights into the relevance of a gender-inclusive criminal justice response in addressing IPA.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Qualitative Study of the Male Victims’ Experiences With the Criminal Justice Response to Intimate Partner Abuse in Four English-Speaking Countries

Lysova¹,

Hanson

Hines

et al. 2020

Criminal Justice and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, a meta-analysis by Park and Kim revealed that participants who experienced violence earlier were more likely to perpetrate or become the victims of DV (S. Park & Kim, 2019). While most of the determinants were reported as risk factors for DV, individual characteristics like self-control (Hébert et al, 2019) and conflict resolution skills (Spencer et al, 2019) have been reported as protective factors against DV.…”

Section: Determinants Of DVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and Determinants of Dating Violence: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Hossain¹,

Sultana²,

Fan³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Dating violence (DV) is a psychosocial problem which impacts the health and wellbeing of affected individuals. Many studies have reported a high prevalence and various determinants of DV; however, there is a gap of consolidated evidence on this problem. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the prevalence and determinants of DV from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We systematically searched ten major databases and additional sources to retrieve systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting prevalence or determinants of DV, published as peer-reviewed journal articles in English language till October 13, 2019. We extracted and synthesized the findings, reported the prevalence of DV, and categorized the determinants of DV using the socioecological model. Results: We found 16 eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Most of these studies were conducted in developed countries with a majority of adolescent and young adult participants. Studies reported varying prevalence of physical, sexual, psychological/emotional, and technology-assisted DV ranging from 0.1% to 57.5%, 0.1% to 64.6%, 4.2% to 97%, and 5.8% to 92%, respectively. The determinants of DV at different socioecological levels, including individual behavior, substance abuse, psychiatric conditions, experiencing violence and maltreatment; interpersonal factors like family and peer relationships; community and neighborhood characteristics; patriarchy, culture, and socioeconomic equalities were reported. Conclusions: These findings suggest a high burden of DV among young populations, who are vulnerable to various socioecological determinants of DV. Future research should examine how these factors influence DV and multi-level interventions should be adopted to address the same.

show abstract

“…Interestingly, fewer studies examined characteristics and profiles of perpetrators of dating violence. In their meta-analysis of the patterns of involvement in dating violence, Park and Kim (2017) found that those who identified themselves as dating violence perpetrators had a previous victimization experience. Unsurprisingly, teens who experienced dating violence perpetration were more likely to be involved with antisocial peers or to be part of aggressive peer groups (Ellis, Chung-Hall, & Dumas, 2012;Swahn, Simon, Arias, & Bossarte, 2008).…”

Section: Teen Involvement In Violent Dating Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family Functioning among Rural Teens and Caregivers: Interactive Influence on Teen Dating Violence

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi‐informant assessment of family functioning is considered best practice in research and clinical settings. However, in the area of teen dating violence, multi‐informant assessment of family functioning has received limited attention. The current study investigated whether and to what extent caregiver and adolescent perceptions of family functioning interact in their influence on adolescent dating violence. Participants were 493 adolescents and their primary caregivers from a rural southeastern community in the United States. As hypothesized, a paired‐samples t test showed that adolescents’ scores on the family functioning measure were significantly lower than their caregivers’ scores. Logistic regressions revealed that adolescents’ positive views of family functioning were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of dating violence victimization but not perpetration and that caregivers’ views on family functioning moderated the impact of adolescent‐reported family functioning on both dating violence outcomes. Post hoc analyses showed that adolescents with negative perceptions of family environment were most likely to be victims and perpetrators of dating violence when their parents also reported more negative views of family environment. The article concludes with a discussion of how these findings can: (a) advance our understanding of the impact of family functioning on teen dating relationships and (b) inform practical efforts aimed at preventing dating aggression among teens.

show abstract

Who Are the Victims and Who Are the Perpetrators in Dating Violence? Sharing the Role of Victim and Perpetrator

Abstract: Further efforts should be put into avoiding categorization of those involved in violence; rather, they should be regarded as a single group. Additionally, evidence-based interventions should be developed for this population to help break the cycle of violence.

Cited by 45 publications

References 47 publications

A Qualitative Study of the Male Victims’ Experiences With the Criminal Justice Response to Intimate Partner Abuse in Four English-Speaking Countries

A Qualitative Study of the Male Victims’ Experiences With the Criminal Justice Response to Intimate Partner Abuse in Four English-Speaking Countries

Prevalence and Determinants of Dating Violence: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Family Functioning among Rural Teens and Caregivers: Interactive Influence on Teen Dating Violence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About