Who Benefits From Humor-Based Positive Psychology Interventions? The Moderating Effects of Personality Traits and Sense of Humor

Abstract

The evidence for the effectiveness of humor-based positive psychology interventions (PPIs; i.e., interventions aimed at enhancing happiness and lowering depressive symptoms) is steadily increasing. However, little is known about who benefits most from them. We aim at narrowing this gap by examining whether personality traits and sense of humor moderate the long-term effects of humor-based interventions on happiness and depressive symptoms. We conducted two placebo-controlled online-intervention studies testing for moderation effects. In Study 1 (N = 104) we tested for moderation effects of basic personality traits (i.e., psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism) in the three funny things intervention, a humor-based PPI. In Study 2 (N = 632) we tested for moderation effects of the sense of humor in five different humor-based interventions. Happiness and depressive symptoms were assessed before and after the intervention, as well as after 1, 3, and 6 months. In Study 2, we assessed sense of humor before and 1 month after the intervention to investigate if changes in sense of humor go along with changes in happiness and depressive symptoms. We found moderating effects only for extraversion. Extraverts benefitted more from the three funny things intervention than introverts. For neuroticism and psychoticism no moderation effects were found. For sense of humor, no moderating effects were found for the effectiveness of the five humor-based interventions tested in Study 2. However, changes in sense of humor from pretest to the 1-month follow-up predicted changes in happiness and depressive symptoms. Taking a closer look, the playful attitude- and sense of humor-subscales predicted changes in happiness and depression for up to 6 months. Overall, moderating effects for personality (i.e., extraversion) were found, but none for sense of humor at baseline. However, increases in sense of humor during and after the intervention were associated with the interventions’ effectiveness. Thus, we found humor-based interventions to be equally suited for humorous and non-humorous people, but increases in the sense of humor during the intervention phase could serve as an indicator whether it is worth continuing the intervention in the long-term.

A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of laughter and humour interventions on depression, anxiety and sleep quality in adults

“…Whereas the beneficial effects of humour are produced by virtue of the cognitive shifts that it entails and the changes in affective quality that accompany it. In other words, it will be influenced by many factors such as cognitive function and personal traits (Dixon, 1980;Wellenzohn, Proyer, & Ruch, 2018). Some studies (Bozikas et al, 2007;Parnowska, Braniecka, & Radomska, 2013) indicated low reception of humour in schizophrenia does a negative impact on the effectiveness of the intervention.…”

Emotional Intelligence and Psychological Well-Being in Adolescents

“…This conception of adolescence is currently fairly different for studies do not only describe the adolescent as a source of problems but also as a valuable asset in a development process [3,4]. This change took place with the arrival of positive psychology, as one of its objectives is to promote psychological research and practice in such areas as positive traits (strengths), positive emotions, and their contribution to well-being [5].…”

The Gratitude visit: Student reflections on a positive psychology experiential learning exercise

“…In recent years, the field is being more thoughtfully defined to encompass the variation of possible outcomes of interventions. The effectiveness of interventions delivered electronically has been studied (e.g., Wellenzohn et al, 2018), cross-culturally (Flores & Lee, 2019), and clinically (Chakhssi, Kraiss, Sommers-Spijkerman, & Bohlmeijer, 2018). Positive education, or the implementation of positive psychology interventions into schooling, has also been studied (Seligman, Ernst, Gillham, Reivich, & Linkins, 2009).…”