2019
DOI: 10.1177/2378023119839518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Who Cares?”: Investigating Consistency in Expressions of Racial Apathy among Whites

Abstract: Survey researchers theorize that how whites express racial prejudice changes across time. They argue one of its contemporary forms is racial apathy (i.e., not caring about racial equality). However, few empirical studies characterize racial apathy. To fill this gap, the present study addresses consistency in racial apathy across time at the population level and individual level. Using three waves of panel data (i.e., 2003, 2007–2008, and 2013) from the National Study of Youth and Religion, the authors examine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Without FIML, the common default of listwise deletion in Model 1 (n = 113) excluded three OECD countries and 38 countries with populations of over one million, which is normal with the common criteria used for sample selection in the quantitative literature (see Appendix B). To be clear, in the social sciences, generally, the issue of missing data continues to be handled by way of listwise deletion or largely ignored, even in studies published in social science journals with an explicit focus on innovative empirical research [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without FIML, the common default of listwise deletion in Model 1 (n = 113) excluded three OECD countries and 38 countries with populations of over one million, which is normal with the common criteria used for sample selection in the quantitative literature (see Appendix B). To be clear, in the social sciences, generally, the issue of missing data continues to be handled by way of listwise deletion or largely ignored, even in studies published in social science journals with an explicit focus on innovative empirical research [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items ask respondents (1) whether they are concerned about Chicago's race relations and (2) whether respondents feel sorry for racial minorities when they see them being poorly treated. Not only do these cross-loaded findings tell us that two items intended to capture racial apathy may be tapping into the latent construct of racial resentment, but it speaks to some of the difficulties encountered when measuring racial apathy (see also Alexander 2018;Brown et al 2019). Future studies may consider refining how the construct is operationalized.…”
Section: Racial Apathy As a Distinct And Complementary Form Of Prejudicementioning
confidence: 93%
“…To date, few inquiries have taken up the construct of racial apathy and those that do tend to study it among whites only (e.g., Alexander 2018;Brown et al 2019;Lewis 2006, 2015). Our project joins recent work by Brown et al (2020) by departing from a singular focus on whites to consider whether other groups adhere to racial apathy as well.…”
Section: Racial Apathy: a Distinct Form Of Prejudicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals and groups are often invested in “knowing badly” or evading knowledge altogether, even when knowledge and understanding are freely available (McGoey 2012; Somin 2015). Mueller's (2020) Theory of Racial Ignorance (TRI) demonstrates how deeply this phenomenon permeates systems ordered by white supremacy, where white people form attachments to mis understanding, not knowing , and (even if they know) not caring about many things related to race and racism (Brown et al 2019; Feagin 2020; Forman and Lewis 2015; Mills 1997). Ignorance and apathy ease the work of maintaining white domination, allowing white people to execute and abide by racism without having to look and feel “racist” (i.e., deviant and immoral).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%