2014
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140202.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Decides on What to Spend in CSR? Moving from Compulsion to Consensus

Abstract: With CSR spending becoming mandatory in some prominent economies, quantum of spend is increasingly becoming a non issue. Instead spending right has acquired prominence. Ever since policy makers mulled the idea of making CSR spending compulsory, there appears to be rush and panic in the business world to spend on CSR activities that gives them the best return on their social investment. The debate is on for decades now, as to who should decide on what to spend and how much? For long in the name of CSR activitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socially responsible actions and information reveal and provide stakeholders with key insights into what a company stands for—its character, values, ethical standards, and goals. Thus behaviors and interactions which embed social obligations toward stakeholders is important for both the company and the stakeholder where the “… firm offers something of value (typically a social benefit or public service) to an important constituency and, in turn, anticipates receiving the approval and support of key individuals and/or socio‐political groups in its environment” (Mohanty , p. 14).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially responsible actions and information reveal and provide stakeholders with key insights into what a company stands for—its character, values, ethical standards, and goals. Thus behaviors and interactions which embed social obligations toward stakeholders is important for both the company and the stakeholder where the “… firm offers something of value (typically a social benefit or public service) to an important constituency and, in turn, anticipates receiving the approval and support of key individuals and/or socio‐political groups in its environment” (Mohanty , p. 14).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India is even one step ahead in this regard compared to other countries. India is perhaps one of the earliest countries that have made CSR spending mandatory through the Companies Act, 2013 where companies of a certain size must spend at least two percent of their three-year average net income on CSR activities (Bhattacharyya & Rahman, 2019;Desai, Viswanath, & Tripathy, 2015;Mohanty, 2014;Abhishek Mukherjee & Bird, 2016;Arup Mukherjee & Chaturvedi, 2013;Sharma, 2013;Singh & Verma, 2014;Varottil, 2018;Verma & Jain, 2019).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this engagement seems to be beneficial for all parties involved, the role of CSR is transforming from harm mitigation to corporate value enhancement [8,9]. This is generally characterized as providing a social benefit or public service in order to ensure approval by key stakeholders [10]. Therefore, CSR aspects must be integrated into the companies' reporting systems in order to establish a communication channel [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%