2002
DOI: 10.1080/13552070215897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who gets to choose? Coercion, consent, and the UN Trafficking Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Divisiveness within the movement is widespread and has permeated feminist NGO networks, state delegations that are working to pass international legislation, and national governments that are working to pass national legislation (Kempadoo et al 2005;Lobasz 2009;Doezema 2002;Doezema 2005;Doezema 2010;Outshoorn 2005). This divisiveness was apparent The problem with this consent-coercion debate is that it often focuses attention on the wrong end of the issue.…”
Section: Pornography Prostitution and Trafficking In Southern Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Divisiveness within the movement is widespread and has permeated feminist NGO networks, state delegations that are working to pass international legislation, and national governments that are working to pass national legislation (Kempadoo et al 2005;Lobasz 2009;Doezema 2002;Doezema 2005;Doezema 2010;Outshoorn 2005). This divisiveness was apparent The problem with this consent-coercion debate is that it often focuses attention on the wrong end of the issue.…”
Section: Pornography Prostitution and Trafficking In Southern Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, these instruments have led to the harassment of prostitutes and migrants by law enforcement officials attempting to end trafficking. This conflation of prostitution and human trafficking has also "led to restrictions on movement and migration for women, increased surveillance of sex workers, and increased deportation of migrant sex workers" (Doezema 2002).…”
Section: Pornography Prostitution and Trafficking In Southern Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of migrants have some agency, and it is unusual for them not to have any choice or receive any benefit in the process. Migrant women working in prostitution are, however, often framed a priori as victims of trafficking without any agency, even when it was their own decision to work in the sex industry (Doezema 2002;Andrijasevic 2004).…”
Section: Smuggling/traffickingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (hereafter, the Protocol) has been co-opted to reinforce existing international debates regarding the disputed relationship between prostitution and the sexual exploitation of women and girls, with some groups engaged in the debates conflating human trafficking, sexual exploitation, and sex work (Doezema, 2002;Hua & Nigorizawa, 2010;Sanghera, 2005;Soderlund, 2005;Thorbek & Pattanaik, 2002). These debates, and the problematic discursive conflation between human trafficking and sex work, has impacted the resulting im-plementation of laws at the domestic state level, limiting not only the advancement of provisions to protect the rights of individuals working in sex industries (Chapkis, 2004;Doezema, 2010;Hua, 2011;Jordan, 2002b;Sanghera, 2005;Soderlund, 2005), but also the implementation of measures that address other forms of exploitation 1 Act 2013), have identified and addressed forced labour as a specific criminal offence within, or outside of, broader anti-trafficking legislation, Canada relies on a "catch-all" trafficking offence that does not delineate specific forms of exploitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%