Who is talking, who is listening? Service recovery through online customer-to-customer interactions

Abstract

Purpose This research investigates customer interactions in an online environment following a service failure, and explores the role of customer-to-customer (C2C) interactions in service recovery. Design/methodology/approach We examine C2C interactions between airline travellers by analysing their detailed conversations posted on an independent complaint forum. We adopt thematic analysis to scrutinise online dialogue that narrates stories about service failures and how they are resolved with the help of other customers. Findings Our analysis reveals that other customers act as helpers, educators, listeners and ironists in an online environment following a service failure. We identify information sharing, emotional release, social support, knowledge exchange and learning, and leadership in the online community as forms of C2C service recovery. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on C2C service recovery in an online environment; C2C interactions in an offline environment after a service failure are not explored. Future research can apply different research methods to different data sources in order to discover further insights into C2C service recovery. Practical implications C2C interactions in service recovery can lead to value creation that enhances customers’ overall satisfaction with their service experiences, and further re-shapes customers’ expectations of the service. Customers are an operant resource for service recovery; thus, service companies should facilitate customer-to-customer interactions that assist successful service recovery. Originality/value This research explores the functions and potential impact of online C2C service recovery; that is, service recovery through online C2C interactions. It advances understanding of service recovery by bridging current thinking on customer-dominant logic and the role of C2C interactions.

Tourists’ experiential value co-creation through online social contacts: Customer-dominant logic perspective

“…A probe on online value cocreation was previously conducted to evaluate the online shopping experience (Mathwick et al, 2001). Xu, Yap, and Hyde (2016) presented C2C interactions among airline travelers by analyzing their detailed conversations posted on an independent online complaint forum.…”

Consumer Revenge Using the Internet and Social Media: An Examination of the Role of Service Failure Types and Cognitive Appraisal Processes

“…Appraisal theory also suggests that negative emotions such as helplessness create a desire to deflect responsibility to the “wrong‐doing” party and engage in retaliatory behaviors (Grégoire & Fisher, ; Ward & Ostrom, ; Wiggin & Yalch, ). Helplessness has been identified as one of the important factors influencing consumer online WOM complaints (Balaji, Jha, & Royne, ; Gelbrich, ; Singh & Pandya, ; Xu, Yap & Hyde, ). Because people who feel helpless also feel less empowered to deal directly with a firm to seek active recovery, reparation, and redress, they are also more likely to feel highly betrayed by the firm (Grégoire et al., ).…”

Exploring the Role of NVivo Software in Marketing Research

“…Smaliukiene et al (2015) performed a netnographic research by coding online forums and classifying data according to C2C interactions and provider-to-customer interactions. Finally, Xu et al (2016) performed a thematic analysis of data concerning C2C online interactions focused on emotions, attitudes, etc. (see Table 1).…”

“…maintaining interaction and matching resources?" Xu et al (2016) Investigating C2C interactions on an "What forms of C2C interaction independent complaints site for assist service recovery, and airline travelers.…”