1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-422x(98)00016-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who knows what? Propagation of knowledge among agents in a literary storyworld

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this prediction, Graesser and his colleagues have shown that a narrative agent's salience in the discourse mediates the extent to which readers monitor their knowledge states (Graesser, Bowers, Olde, White, & Person, 1999) and remember their dialogue (Graesser, Bowers, Olde, & Pomeroy, 1999). Although Graesser's research is relevant to the present study and this prediction, it is important to note that they did not study character goals.…”
Section: Factors That Influence the Monitoring Of A Character's Goalsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In support of this prediction, Graesser and his colleagues have shown that a narrative agent's salience in the discourse mediates the extent to which readers monitor their knowledge states (Graesser, Bowers, Olde, White, & Person, 1999) and remember their dialogue (Graesser, Bowers, Olde, & Pomeroy, 1999). Although Graesser's research is relevant to the present study and this prediction, it is important to note that they did not study character goals.…”
Section: Factors That Influence the Monitoring Of A Character's Goalsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Despite the fact that most narratives contain multiple characters interacting in a story world, relatively little research has been done that assesses the extent to which understanders monitor the concerns and construct elaborate representations of multiple characters (see Graesser, Bowers, Olde, & Pomeroy, 1999;Graesser, Bowers, Olde, White, & Person, 1999;Trabasso & Nickels, 1992). Although it seems reasonable that narrative understanding and appreciation require viewers and readers to keep track of multiple characters' goals, it is also likely that working memory constraints place limitations on one's ability to do so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other psycholinguistic research on perspective taking tends to employ more offline measures, such as explicit judgments of a story character's knowledge (e.g., Gerrig, Brennan, & Ohaeri, 2001;Graesser, Bowers, Olde, White, & Person, 1999) or a probe recognition task following a target sentence (e.g., Albrecht, O'Brien, Mason, & Myers, 1995). In general, it has been found that readers often do not suppress their privileged information when switching perspective to an ignorant story character's perspective or when judging what this character knows.…”
Section: Perspective Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, comprehension of plot is dependent on comprehension of relationship. Graesser et al (1999) have shown that the process of tracking the changing mental states of characters in a story depends on apprehending their social relationships to key protagonists. For example, if we learn that Sir Toby Belch in Twelfth Night hates Malvolio and wants to humiliate him, then we can infer by default that Feste, Fabian, and Aguecheek will want this too, since they form Belch's social clique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%