2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/aehp8
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who likes extraverts? Re-examining motivational tradeoff effects in social perception

Abstract: Although many facial features elicit similar personality impressions across different perceivers, there are also substantial individual differences. Brown and Sacco conducted several studies to explore which perceiver characteristics explain these differences. Applying the idea of motivational tradeoffs, they showed that extraverted-looking targets are perceived more positively by perceivers whose social needs are more likely to be met by extraverted individuals. Here, we conduct two preregistered replications… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, Shiramizu et al (2019) noticed that most studies focussing on facial correlates of the Dark Triad were using the same dataset (the Faceaurus), and they conducted a (true) replication by generating a new stimulus set. Similarly, Jaeger et al (2021) conducted preregistered replications of studies exploring the perception of extraverted-looking individuals 4 where they used new stimuli sets in addition to the Faceaurus dataset, and discussed various kinds of limitations. Holtzman added the link to a blog post discussing the false-positive inflation issue in studies using face prototypes (DeBruine, 2020) on his website https://nickholtzman.com/faceaurus/ ('Faceaurus', 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, Shiramizu et al (2019) noticed that most studies focussing on facial correlates of the Dark Triad were using the same dataset (the Faceaurus), and they conducted a (true) replication by generating a new stimulus set. Similarly, Jaeger et al (2021) conducted preregistered replications of studies exploring the perception of extraverted-looking individuals 4 where they used new stimuli sets in addition to the Faceaurus dataset, and discussed various kinds of limitations. Holtzman added the link to a blog post discussing the false-positive inflation issue in studies using face prototypes (DeBruine, 2020) on his website https://nickholtzman.com/faceaurus/ ('Faceaurus', 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…conducted preregistered replications of studies exploring the perception of extraverted-looking individuals (Jaeger et al, 2021) 3 where they used new stimuli sets in addition to the Faceaurus dataset, and discussed various kinds of limitations. Holtzman added the link to a blog post discussing the false-positive inflation issue in studies using face prototypes (DeBruine, 2020b) in his website ("Faceaurus," 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people are motivated to avoid others who are perceived to pose infection risks (Millar et al, 2020; Murray & Schaller, 2016; Park et al, 2013). Moreover, dispositional disease concerns are linked with reduced preferences for extraverted faces (Brown & Sacco, 2016; but see Jaeger et al, 2021). Finally, contextual cues of disease salience (e.g., viewing images, watching movie clips, reading a paragraph, or recalling past experience about infectious disease) lower state extraversion scores (Mortensen et al, 2010), reduce state need to belong (Sacco et al, 2014), increase participants’ avoidant movement from photos of other people (Mortensen et al, 2010), and decrease romantic interest in potential partners (Sawada et al, 2018).…”
Section: Infectious Disease Threat May Not Moderate Exclusion Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%