2015
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2015.997999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who needs restraining? Re-examining the use of physical restraint in an English young offender institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then they'd know how it felt, because that's how it feels to me. (Wilson 2003, p. 422) Some previous work into prison staff and prisoners' perspectives, from the 1980s in Britain, had also identified similar issues regarding racial/ethnic hierarchy and ethnic solidarity (Genders et al 1989). In one of the most recent ethnographic accounts of prisoner perspectives, Phillips (2008) in her two-site study of an adult prison and a YOI, showed social class and neighbourhood identities to be more salient and argued that multiculturalism discourses were evidently and actively negotiated in daily interethnic encounters through a shifting process of otherisation in the context of ethnicity, faith, class, and nationality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Then they'd know how it felt, because that's how it feels to me. (Wilson 2003, p. 422) Some previous work into prison staff and prisoners' perspectives, from the 1980s in Britain, had also identified similar issues regarding racial/ethnic hierarchy and ethnic solidarity (Genders et al 1989). In one of the most recent ethnographic accounts of prisoner perspectives, Phillips (2008) in her two-site study of an adult prison and a YOI, showed social class and neighbourhood identities to be more salient and argued that multiculturalism discourses were evidently and actively negotiated in daily interethnic encounters through a shifting process of otherisation in the context of ethnicity, faith, class, and nationality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such concerns are well-established in the literature. Features such as the use of physical restraint (Carlile, 2006;Gooch, 2015;Hart, 2008; Joint Committee on Human Rights, 2008; Office of the Children's Commissioner, 2011), the loss of liberty (Sykes, 1958) and solitary confinement (Gooch, 2016) and bullying and violence (Butler, 2008;Gooch, 2019;Ministry of Justice, 2016) have led several scholars to conclude that children's experiences in custody amount to institutionalised abuse (Goldson, 2009;Gooch, 2015) and a violation of children's rights (Joint Committee on Human Rights, 2019). This has been amplified by the impact of COVID 19, during which concern was expressed that children were only let out of their cell for one hour per day (HMIP, 2020).…”
Section: Conditions and Outcomes Of Children Within The Custodial Estatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routine use of physical restraint as a response to challenging behaviour in child custody has frequently been called into question (Hart & Howell, 2004; Stone, 2012). It has been declared at the very least controversial, unsafe and in some cases unlawful (Gooch, 2015; Howard League, 2011).…”
Section: The Context: Understanding ‘Restraint’mentioning
confidence: 99%