1977
DOI: 10.2307/3103239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Pays for Clean Air: The Cost and Benefit Distribution of Federal Automobile Emission Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there still remain the technical challenges to more widely spread EVs [2]- [4], compared to the traditional internal combustion engine-based vehicle, EV has shown its ability to reduce the CO 2 emissions significantly [5], save the energy with the eco-driving [6], [7], increase the vehicle dynamic performances [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there still remain the technical challenges to more widely spread EVs [2]- [4], compared to the traditional internal combustion engine-based vehicle, EV has shown its ability to reduce the CO 2 emissions significantly [5], save the energy with the eco-driving [6], [7], increase the vehicle dynamic performances [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemel refers to a variety of sources, on which I draw here. SeeHarrison (1975) (finding that the cost of automobile emission controls as a proportion of income is larger for lowerincome households than for higher-income households, while the distribution of benefits by income is less clear);Dorfman (1977) (estimating the benefits of pollution control based on self-reported willingness to pay and finding that pollution control imposes net costs on lower-income households and yields net benefits for higher-income households);Gianessi et al (1979) (finding that air-pollution controls impose net costs on higher-income households and generate net benefits for lower-income households while automobile emissions controls impose net costs on all income groups);Kahn (2001) (finding that "regulation under the Clean Air Act has helped, and not economically harmed, the 'have nots. '").10 See McGee (2021).Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%