Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey

Abstract

Background Although higher taxation of tobacco products is considered the most cost-effective tobacco control policy, its negative impact on low-income groups is one of the arguments used against it. Objective To investigate the impact of current excise taxes and the increases of excise taxes on tobacco and household expenditures by expenditure tertiles, and examine who pays excise taxes in general. Method Impacts of excise taxes on cigarettes are examined with a budgetary approach. We first estimate the price elasticity of cigarettes by expenditure tertiles using data from the 2003 Turkish Household Expenditure Survey, the most recent data set covering detailed tobacco product information relevant to our analysis. We then conduct a number of simulation analyses by increasing the excise taxes per pack of cigarettes and examine the impacts of these increases on household expenditures. Finally, as excise tax increases, we predict the total excise tax paid by households in different expenditure tertiles and compare the concentration curve of excise tax spending with the Lorenz curve showing the cumulative share of total household expenditures by expenditure tertiles. We estimate the progressivity coefficient that measures the area between the Lorenz and concentration curves. Results The low-income group is found to be the most sensitive to tax and price increases. It spends a relatively higher share of the household expenditure on cigarettes compared with higher income groups. However, the results suggest a different outcome as excise tax increases; the share of household expenditures spent on cigarettes declines for all household tertiles but a significant reduction occurs on the lowest expenditure tertile, suggesting that increases in excise taxes are progressive. Furthermore, the highest expenditure tertile pays the highest excise tax among expenditure tertiles, and their share in total excise revenue increases as the excise tax per pack of cigarettes increases. Conclusions The poor smoking households benefit the most from increases in excise taxes; from a budgetary perspective, as they reduce their smoking consumption significantly, the share of their excise payment in total household expenditures declines. From a health perspective, they are likely to have more health benefits as their consumption reduces. Government revenues are also predicted to increase with increased excise taxes, and the government can allocate a part of these revenue increases on implementing and enforcing other tobacco control measures including cessation support and smokefree environments. © 2015, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved

Firm strategy and consumer behaviour under a complex tobacco tax system: implications for the effectiveness of taxation on tobacco control

“…Using the 1994 Household Expenditure Survey, the price elasticity is estimated as −0.41 24. In a replication of the micro study with the 2003 Household Expenditure Survey, the elasticity is estimated as −0.67 25. The evidence from the use of annual time series data also points to an estimate of −0.39 17…”

Impact of Individual, Familial and Parental Factors on Adolescent Smoking in Turkey

“…The burden of smoking among adolescents remains high, especially in countries such as Turkey where smoking cessation policies may be ineffective. The cost of smoking remains high with evidence reporting variations in household income and cigarette expenses among low-income and middle-income countries, i.e., 4.25% and 7.2% for lowincome households and between 1.65% and 3% for the higher income households [16]. In addition to behavioural determinants, structural factors including legislation and regulation associated with tobacco use, tobacco industry advertising and lobbying, government revenue-raising (e.g., through taxes, levies, etc.)…”

Health information and life-course smoking behavior: evidence from Turkey

“…Over our sample period consumers faced widely varying tobacco control policies. For example, nominal and real cigarette prices varied tremendously, because the government changed its taxes on cigarettes and tobacco, while it simultaneously created and tamed inflation [22,23]. Cigarette taxes varied from 44% of their retail price in the 1960s to 82.25% of a pack's retail price by 2014.…”