2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-021-09655-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who’s calling? The effect of phone calls and personal interaction on tax compliance

Abstract: Most tax agencies use letters as the method of communicating with taxpayers. Still, other technologies exist that could be more effective. This paper reports the results of a field experiment conducted by the National Tax Agency of Colombia (DIAN), using phone calls to reduce tax delinquencies. DIAN randomly assigned 34,000 tax debtors to a phone call operation using a fixed script to communicate existing debts and invite taxpayers to a meeting at the local tax agency office. Phone calls were very effective to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the paper also adds to the literature that studies the impact of notifications sent by tax authorities on tax compliance (Mascagni, 2018;Antinyan and Asatryan, 2020;Slemrod, 2019). To this date various aspects of the notifications have been manipulated, such as the delivery method (e.g., Doerrenberg and Schmitz, 2017;Mogollón et al, 2021;Ortega and Scartascini, 2020), the content and the framing of the notification (e.g., Hallsworth et al, 2017;Hernandez et al, 2017;Bott et al, 2019;De Neve et al, 2019), and the timing of the communication (e.g., Gillitzer and Sinning, 2020). To the best of our knowledge, the impact of notification frequency on tax compliance is understudied so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the paper also adds to the literature that studies the impact of notifications sent by tax authorities on tax compliance (Mascagni, 2018;Antinyan and Asatryan, 2020;Slemrod, 2019). To this date various aspects of the notifications have been manipulated, such as the delivery method (e.g., Doerrenberg and Schmitz, 2017;Mogollón et al, 2021;Ortega and Scartascini, 2020), the content and the framing of the notification (e.g., Hallsworth et al, 2017;Hernandez et al, 2017;Bott et al, 2019;De Neve et al, 2019), and the timing of the communication (e.g., Gillitzer and Sinning, 2020). To the best of our knowledge, the impact of notification frequency on tax compliance is understudied so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%