1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01410898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who shall hold the conch? some thoughts on community control of mental health programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terms powerless, isolated, supplicant, one-down, no-hope-inlife as descriptions of mental health patients have appeared repeatedly in the literature (Darley, 1974 Ryan, 1971).…”
Section: Methods Of Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms powerless, isolated, supplicant, one-down, no-hope-inlife as descriptions of mental health patients have appeared repeatedly in the literature (Darley, 1974 Ryan, 1971).…”
Section: Methods Of Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the basic philosophy of the therapeutic community (Daniels & Rubin, 1968) would at times appear similar to that of the client advisory board, the clients in a therapeutic community actually have no clearly defined power to evaluate a facility's services. And, even though some (e.g., Darley, 1974) have advocated that the clients in therapeutic communities be given more governing power, to date this has not been realized. Furthermore, no one has reported a therapeutic community which actually encourages clients to systematically evaluate the programs and services of that community.…”
Section: The Client As Evaluator Of Mental Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), as well as attitudes of independence (Morrison & Yablonovitz,Note 8). It is possible that participation in the governing power of a clinic (e.g., by means of being able to evaluate and recommend changes) induces clients to feel less helpless and powerless (Darley, 1974) and have more control over their destiny (Morrison, 1976b). It is likely that such a positive experience can be understood in terms of clients learning to make more positive attributions to themselves, and to thus see less need for dependence on psychiatric services.…”
Section: The Consumer As Agent Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study emerged from the current emphasis on the psychiatric client as both consumer and evaluator of services received (Darley, 1974;Denner & Halprin, 1974;Hart & Bassett, 1975;Morrison, 1976; Morrison, in press-a; Morrison, in press-b) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study of discharged psychiatric clients focused on three relatively unresearched areas in community mental health: (1) the correspondence of staffclient evaluations of discharge readiness; (2) the frequency with which clients seek alternate psychiatric services subsequent to discharge; and (3) the perceived effect of nontreatment therapeutic events (e.g., falling in love, finding a job) on client problem resolution. The study emerged from the current emphasis on the psychiatric client as both consumer and evaluator of services received (Darley, 1974; Denner & Halprin, 1974;Hart & Bassett, 1975;Morrison, 1976; Morrison, in press-a; Morrison, in press-b) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%