Who Wants to Give Forever? Giving Meaning to Sustainability in Development

Abstract

This paper argues strongly in favour of a re-examination of the term 'sustainability' in international development research, policy and practice. It demonstrates that the term is understood pluralistically, being both environmental and economic. Within economic interpretations, this paper identifies three clear understandings of 'sustainability', which effect programme design and, ultimately, their impact on poverty significantly. The paper argues that the ramifications of this definition go far beyond semantics and have a significant impact on the development outcomes realised by programmes that incorporate the term. Having evaluated these conceptions, the paper argues for sustainability in development as being interventions that alter the causes of poverty so that the process through which change occurs is improved in an adaptive and permanent way, a permanent increase in adaptability. Evidence is drawn from a review of the literature and policy documentation.

Sustainable Development in EU Countries: Concept and Rating of Levels of Development

“…The term 'sustainable development' is very widely used, hence publications in the subject area abound with varying approaches and concepts (Giddings et al ., ; Kidd, ; Taylor, ). This constitutes both cognitive and practical difficulties, since sustainable development can be understood and interpreted in various ways.…”

The Short‐ and Long‐term Effects of Development Projects: Evidence From Ethiopia

“…Finally, some development programmes working at the macro level attempt to intervene in the functioning of the partner country in order to ‘turn the purchase of fishing rods and acquisition of fishing skills into a more efficient process’ (Taylor, ). However, because this paper works with a household‐level dataset that reports only participation in development projects that affected the households surveyed directly, I cannot examine the effects of this last category.…”

A gendered ecosystem services approach to identify novel and locally-relevant strategies for jointly improving food security, nutrition, and conservation in the Barotse Floodplain

“…Research indicates how some of the gaps for guiding sustainable and inclusive agricultural development can be filled by: 1) emphasizing nutritional and agricultural diversity (rather than simply closing yield gaps) for food and nutrition security (McKenzie & Williams, 2015); 2) highlighting the benefits or ecosystem services delivered by natural resources essential for ecosystem functioning (TEEB, 2015) and for the wellbeing of the people who depend on them (Suich et al, 2015); and 3) recognizing and incorporating local knowledge and context-dependent constraints for agriculture (Snyder & Cullen, 2014;TEEB, 2015;Taylor, 2014).…”